Drew Hinkes Profile picture
May 30, 2020 17 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Court affirms terminating sanctions & default (aka, case over, you lose) against Ringgold for submiting false declarations to defend against the SEC’s case, finding the dec's were false, they were submitted willfully and that terminating sanctions were appropriate under Malone /1 Image
Ringgold and #Blockvest marketed an #ICO selling BLV tokens falsely marketing them as “registered” and/or “approved” by the SEC, CFTC, NFA, and touting “partner[ship]” with Deloitte, and createda fictitious regulatory agency, the #Blockchain Exchange Commission
Defendants filed declarations in opposition to govt's motion for preliminary injunction; in later discovery, it was revealed that declarations were forged, included misrepresentations and false statements were made in Dorsey and Vaculik’s declarations.
SEC moved for terminating sanctions seeking default judgment against Defendant for his fraudulent conduct in submitting these forged and false declarations; Ringgold opposed without offering contradicting evidence presents denials and argument in his opposition and Objections.
Court granted terminating sanctions, entered default; on appeal court affirmed Russell dec was forged, misreps were made in Wartanian’s declaration, and false statements were made in Dorsey & Vaculik’s decs
here's where it's v. interesting, in light of the similar motion pending in the #craigwright case: the court notes that termination may occur without violating the 7th amendent and discusses the standard for terminating sanctions for discovery misconduct under 9th cir law: Image
the 11th Cir doesn't follow Malone; the 11th appears to follow Betty K Agencies, Ltd. v. M/V MONADA, which holds that a dismissal w/prejudice is appropriate: (1) a party engages in a clear pattern of delay or willful contempt (contumacious conduct); and
(2) the district court specifically finds that lesser sanctions would not suffice.” anf id “thought to be more appropriate in a case where a party, as distinct from counsel, is culpable.” Requires a clear record of delay or willful conduct and that lesser sanctions are inadequate
Court found Ringgold's actions were willful /in bad faith; found an interest in expeditious litigation, & that the Court docket management(when would these factors NOT be present?)& found the "fraudulent conduct" caused meaningful & lasting prejudice to the SEC & investors Image
CRITICAL: the court has to find that the misconduct impacts more than just the time & expense of discovery; it has to cause prejudice to "the [opposing party’s] ability to go to trial or threaten to interfere with the rightful decision of the case.”
Court found that Ringgold's fraud prejudiced the SEC's ability to ascertain facts to support its claims, & protracted the length of discovery as the SEC had to prove the falsity of the claims, found it pertinent as to the issue of disgorgement as a remedy &thus central to claims.
The last material issue is whether dismissal was the least drastic sanction avaialble. SEC argued lesser sanction would encourage more fraudulent behavior; Ringgold argues otherwise, cites to Malone that asks re: the availability of lesser sanctions; (2) the use of lesser
sanctions before termination; and (3) the adequate warning of the possibility of termination. But in egregious cases such an inquiry is not necessary, especially if the discovery violations ‘threaten to interfere with the rightful decision of the case.’
The crux of the Court's analysis is whether the “pattern of deception and discovery abuse made it impossible” for the district court to conduct a trial “with any reasonable assurance that the truth would be available.” Id. at 1057-58 (quoting Anheuser–Busch, Inc., 69 F.3d at 352)
This court concluded that "given his pattern of artifice, the Court anticipates that Ringgold will not be truthful in upcoming court proceedings as he has failed to explain the inconsistencies in his deposition testimony and declarations [and in the declarations and testimony]."
The court found that the pattern of willful misconduct supported terminating sanctions, & that a lesser sanction "will...place Ringgold in the same position in which he was before he filed the false declarations ...[no lesser sanction] will deter Defendant’s continued misconduct.
Although these arguments may play out similarly in litigation involving #CraigWright, a few caveats: while the law may be similar, #blockvest is an SEC enforcement action, not a private claim, & Defendants here didn't have counsel to defend them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Drew Hinkes

Drew Hinkes Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @propelforward

Jun 19
On the #ETH declination letter () received by @Consensys. Declination letters are rare & to be savored. Congrats to the team behind this! But what does this mean for staking? For other POS systems and their assets? Time for some educated speculation /1
The letter indicates 2 things. 1. that the investigation captioned "In the Matter of Ethereum 2.0 (C-08950)" is "concluded," and that 2. the SEC "do[es] not intend to recommend an enforcement action [against Consensys] with respect to this investigation" These are both great /2
However (that's the fancy version of "but"), this does not mean that all questions as to staking are resolved, that all questions that may apply to other POS tokens are likewise off the table, that other investigations are not ongoing, /3
Read 4 tweets
Feb 19, 2023
#Illinois Senate Bill SB1887 would drive out #blockchain #node operators, #miners, and #validators, waste judicial resources, and confuse existing law in a quixotic attempt to protect Illinois consumers. Let's examine the mess in a #thread:
as a preface, This is a stunning reverse course for a state that was previously pro -innovation. Instead we now get possibly the most unworkable state law related to #crypto and #blockchain I’ve ever seen. A shocking turn of events for the #tech community in #illinois /2
SB1887 focuses on consumer protection (this is GOOD). But, the manner in which it seeks to protect consumers is to require #node operators ##miners & #validators to do impossible things, or things that create for themselves new criminal & civil liability at pain of fines/ fees /3
Read 22 tweets
Sep 22, 2022
CFTC brings first regulatory action against an alegal #DAO, charging #OokiDao with operating an unlicensed FCM; seeking disgorgement, restitution, civil moneyary penalties, trading and registration bans and injunctive relief. Lots to talk about here: /1 cftc.gov/PressRoom/Pres…
allegations in claim against Ooki #Dao characertize it as an "unincorporated association comprised of holder of Ooki Tokens" and legacy BZRX Tokens who have voted those tokens to govern (e.g. to modify, operate market and take other actions w/r/t the Oooki Protocol." /2
This a huge distinction. While the #DAO is itself a named party, it is unincorporated which leads to all sorts of material questions about who can be sued for what. In this case the complaint makes clear that the Dao is those who (a) have tokens and (b) have voted to govern. /3
Read 17 tweets
Aug 17, 2022
Important questions for those who may have received blocked property in a #grief #spray #spam attack from blocked #tornadocash #ETH addrsses remain unanswered. #OFAC may give clarity in an FAQ; are a few questions that would be helpful for OFAC to address.1st some background/1
By now all of #crypto knows that #OFAC sanctioned #ETH & #USDC addresses related to #Tornadocash and service providers and many #crypto users are struggling to adapt. Why? /2
We’re dealing with a law designed to regulate legal people & entities, &their property, not quasi-autonomous code used by third parties to transact third party assets to others. Arguably the designation exceeds #OFAC’s statutory authority. That’s an argument for another day. /3
Read 23 tweets
Jun 26, 2022
#Dao is another word the #crypto industry uses for ...well... anything. Here's a proposed taxonomy to clarify what we mean when we say #Dao: (a quickie sunday am #thread): /1
@VitalikButerin's seminal work discussing the types of human/tech hybrid ventures that may/will be created using censorship resistant technology tools remains the first stop for this discussion: (blog.ethereum.org/2014/05/06/dao…) /2
@vitalik observes that a #DAO "has the murkiest definition of all... it is an entity that lives on the internet and exists autonomously, but also heavily relies on hiring individuals to perform certain tasks that the automaton itself cannot do." /3
Read 28 tweets
Jun 8, 2022
#NYDFS issues USD backed #stablecoin guidance; must be fully backed by an asset reserve; issuer must adopt a clear redemption policy, approved by DFS in writing (!!!) redemption at par in fiat; reserve must be held in custody with /1
dfs.ny.gov/reports_and_pu…
US state/federally chartered depository institutions and/or asset custodians. Reserve must be held in govt treasuries "subject to DFS- approved reqs re: overcollaterialiation." Reserve must be subject to independent audit 1x month by independent CPA under AICPA attestation /2
standards. DFS may also impose obligations regarding cybersecurity and IT standards and evaluate issuer BSA/AML & Sanctions compliance, safety and soundness of the issuing entity; and the stability/integrity of the payment system, as applicable on Issuers. /3
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(