I have been in DC for more than a year now and I'm struck by the soul searching going on in the US expert community regarding what to do in the #MiddleEast. Numerous articles discuss a potential #US "withdrawal" from the Middle East. Here is a thread and a reading list:
A first dimension of this debate is a 2016 article from Andrew J Bacevich, making a general case against interventionism and a call to "end endless wars". foreignaffairs.com/articles/unite…
But I feel that the discussion intensified in 2019 when voices like @Martin_Indyk, a Peace Process veteran, echoed similar concerns based on the analysis that only few vital American interests were still at stake in the Middle East.
wsj.com/articles/the-m…
Similar arguments have been made by other distinguished American Middle East experts, like @aarondmiller2 & Richard Sokolsky, who explain the US could adapt to oil crises or security challenges without such a big military footprint,.... politico.com/news/magazine/…
...or @tcwittes & Mara Karlin, who described the "purgatory" of the US trying to retreat without having designed the right strategy for it. foreignaffairs.com/articles/middl…
Mara Karlin & @tcwittes recently doubled down on their case and described in another article how the US could "do more with less" in the Middle East. foreignaffairs.com/articles/middl…
The "withdrawal" rationale has been pushed even further in this article by @JustinTLogan who argues that funding for military operation in the Middle East should simply be cut. warontherocks.com/2020/10/defund…
These discussions also have a generational dimension for experts whose foreign policy career began with the 9/11. @brhodes, former Obama advisor, reflected on this in the @TheAtlantic. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
And @ilangoldenberg made a similar case in the @washingtonpost based on a first assessment of the impact of #Covid_19. washingtonpost.com/outlook/2020/0…
Beyond the idea that US foreign policy has to enter a new phase, a number of prominent voices, like my boss @robsatloff, have expressed skepticism about the notion that the US had to leave the Middle East and warned against its false promises. foreignaffairs.com/articles/middl…
Others, like @stevenacook, recently made another strong case against the "exit" and instead stressed the need to prioritize (contain Iran, protecting sealines, Israël, East Med...).... foreignaffairs.com/articles/unite…
My colleague @MichaelSinghDC showed the limit of the notion of "endless wars" that dominates the discussion. He argues that "The real antidote to “endless war” is more disciplined policymaking" and more limited use of force with clear, realistic aims. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/…
In another paper, @MichaelSinghDC also discussed whether the Middle East is a distraction from "great power competition", or a theater for it, concluding that "despite its superficial charms, a policy of withdrawal would run counter to self-interest." washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysi…
Since the discussion on a potential US "withdrawal" has started, a number of commentators, like Ezzedine Choukri Fishere, have also warned about the risk to be pulled back in the Middle East, at a higher price. washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/…
Despite calls to end "endless wars", it has been pointed out, e.g. by @IgnatiusPost, that the US hasn't actually left and that the recipe for the US to stay was "small numbers, low casualty, good partners & adversaries who frighten their neighbors". washingtonpost.com/opinions/there…
But one interesting dimension of this debate pointed out by @WillWechsler is that the potential withdrawal is not based on a change in US capacities but a change in the will to be in the Middle East, which has emboldened US adversaries. atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/upl…
At the end, the issue of a US withdrawal is as much about perception than facts. The big question is whether this think tanks debate has a self fulfilling dimension. To which extent will it influence the calculus of actors in the Middle East and of US policy makers?
Feel free to add below other articles that I may have missed ! (END)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Charles Thépaut

Charles Thépaut Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @diplocharlie

11 Sep
This OpEd is misleading in so many ways...I’ll try to recall few elements :
1/ For a smarter read on the French-German division of labor, @JosephdeWeck explains why you need military solidarity with Greece AND mediation efforts with Turkey. internationalepolitik.de/en/pariscope-h…
2/ A more serious analysis of the rethoric wld show TUR officials started issuing insulting statements against Macron personally in 2019, while his own statements focused on policy disagreements with TUR. There are simply no “rhetorical broadsides against Erdogan”.
Read 23 tweets
6 Aug
Sérieux les gars, les clichés sur le mandat français et OSS117 c’est un peu court pour commenter la visite du PR au à #Beyrouth, et c’est quand même d’un grand manque de respect pour ce que vivent les Libanais depuis plusieurs mois, pour plusieurs raisons:
Le niveau de destruction causée par l’explosion dans une zone éco essentielle et la profondeur de la crise politique et sociale libanaise devraient inviter à regarder ce que cette visite permet et ce qu’elle dit de la situation, et pas se regarder le nombril français.
Ceux qui s’intéressent sincèrement au Liban savent qu’une crise politique sans précédent est en cours depuis le début du mouvement de protestation en octobre, notamment suscité par l’exaspération face à la crise éco et la mauvaise gouvernance, également rappelée par l’explosion.
Read 11 tweets
24 Jun
(THREAD) 1/ In this article for @ForeignPolicy on #Syria, I discuss a complicated but immensely important topic: the weaponization of humanitarian assistance by the Syrian regime. Spoiler: things CAN be fixed. #SyriaConf2020 foreignpolicy.com/2020/06/24/how…
2/ Three paradoxes: i/UN/NGOs do great work assisting millions but accept regime hijacking of aid ii/EU&US provided $30bn of UN aid since 2011 but don't push back on aid diversion iii/UN/NGOs centralize ops in Damascus but don't fix the system & ignore a fragmented huma reality.
3/ i/ The huma response in #Syria is a logistical masterpiece & an ethical conundrum: the UN has set one of the most robust coordination systems but the huma community is paralyzed on diversion, despite multiple reports 👉 @HaidHaid22 @hrw @TheSyriaCmpgn @ScprSyria @annie_sparrow
Read 13 tweets
20 Mar
The Syrian regime asks the #US and the #EU to lift its economic sanctions to let him respond to the #coronavirus outbreak in #Syria. Let’s look at these sanctions to see what the regime wants to achieve with that. Spoiler: not assisting its population. syria.news/40b096fb-19032…
1/ Western sanctions against the Syrian regime are not preventing the regime to provide medical assistance to Syrians. There is no general embargo on #Syria. #US and #EU sanctions do NOT target the medical sector.
2/ 71 entities and 277 individuals are targeted by #EU sanctions because they are tied to the repression or funding of the regime. Sanctions also target sectors at the heart of the financial networks of the regime : weapons, tech tools for repression, crude oil import...
Read 12 tweets
5 Mar
Details of the potential TUR-RUS deal on a ceasefire still unknown.
Min. Lavrov told journalists about the set up of a “security corridor” in #Idlib #Syria
Acc. to press report, Pres. Erdogan told there was an agreement for a ceasefire in #Idlib starting at midnight.
Read 23 tweets
22 Jan
So some people might connect this with #Chirac’s famous “do you want me to go back to my plane?”. But let’s look at the specifics.
First, for those who missed, here is what everybody is thinking about: a similar incident with Chirac in 1996 which profoundly and positively influenced his image in the Arab world for decades:
But today’s exchange between Pres. Macron and the Israeli sec is a bit different. It not abt having enough space in the market like Chirac in the old city in 1996.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!