1/ Ontario COVID19 Testing and You (i.e. The Taxpayer)
Conservatively estimated total cost-to-date to Ontarians for PCR testing (incl. asymptomatics)?
Over $350,000,000
At 61,809 tests today, @ ~$52.50/test, that cost you ~$3.25m, or annualized…
~$1.2 billion (with a “B”)…
2/ The province is putting on a masterclass in resource misallocation…
For perspective, the Ontario Gov’t spends ~$4.3b annually on Long-Term Care.
That’s ~$150/day/resident, ~78,000 residents.
We are doing ~62,000 tests/day at @ ~$52.50 per test (again, ~$1.2b annualized).
3/ We should probably ask the question…
Given (i) the age stratified differences in COVID19 mortality, and (ii) that almost 2/3rds of all COVID19 mortality were of LTC residents, does it make sense to spend 27% of the annual LTC budget on mass PCR testing?
4/ It doesn’t.
…to be fair, the Ont gov’t will invest in LTC: in its recent 2020 Budget, it earmarked ~$1.75b to increase LTC capacity by 30,000 beds (not completed ‘til ‘22).
…so your annual testing cost, taxpayer, is in the ballpark of the cost of needed LTC investments.
5/ So just to drive the point home, we are spending on an annual run rate basis ~$1.2 billion for PCR testing, which is 27% of the annual LTC budget, and ~70% of needed long-term LTC investments.
6/ All this spending and resource misallocation (in my view) may come home to roost, as indicated today by the Ontario Financial Accountability Officer…
7b/ An additional estimate here of ~$100-125 per test, given by a #COVIDZero proponent (so my using an estimate of ~$52.50 could be rather conservative).
1. The actual all-in cost per COVID19 test 2. The % of tests processed by private, non-public labs 3. The major public lab beneficiaries of this testing spend
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Vaccine debate now brewing on (i) who gets it first, and (ii) vaccine rates required for herd-immunity & getting back to normal.
Public Health says no normal ‘til vax rates are 60-70% (*assumed* herd threshold).
The Toronto data says perhaps just 10.9%...
Let’s explore…
2/
I’ll get to the data in a moment, but first, I present two opposing viewpoints, then you can decide what the data says makes the most sense…
3a/
1st view, Dr. Yaffe today in Ontario:
“its gonna take months before…significant % of the pop vaxx’d--usually for infectious diseases 60-70% of the pop is needed for herd immunity; we’re not gonna get there until probably the summer”… 22m:30s:
Link thread of the powerful & thought-provoking short video essays produced by @katewand on lockdown/COVID culture. She's now produced 4 of these incredible videos to date, & frankly I’m a bit shocked her following hasn’t grown faster (although she’s now at 2.3K subs on YT).👇
“In the COVID debate, there is a mainstream, 'popular' narrative, and a competing, 'unpopular' narrative — a 'fringe.' The former exploits the common, mediocre desire to be 'popular.'"
Some chatter in Q&A’s in last few daily briefs with Premier/health officials re: rising cases in Windsor & potential for moving region to lockdown (just moved to “Red” zone on Mon, Nov 30).
Concern is hospital “overrun”… local hospital trends shown here…
2/
Case picture: yes, cases are rising, but overwhelming majority are traced to close contact or outbreak. Averaging only ~8 reported community cases of unknown origin per day.
3/
Overall new emergency admissions for three main Windsor-Essex hospitals appear to be:
*FLAT* for the entire month of November.
(Entire Erie-St.Clair area including Chatham/Sarnia also flat).
In this thread, I’ll show the absurdity of a citywide shutdown, simply using by-neighbourhood case/positivity data, w/ census data integration.
Unmeasurable, unnecessary collateral harm is coming; please read/share.
(get a cup of coffee)
2/ Note: if you are not in Toronto/Canada, you will still find this #SARSCoV2 prevalence analysis and its conclusions compelling, as these same dynamics likely exist in many of the world’s major cities.
3/ Quick note: this analysis follows and adds substantially to a previous related thread, found here (tweets 4a/b sites the data sources/limitations, which are the same as used in this current thread). All %pos/cases data is cumulative since Aug 30.
…focusing in on the correlations between (i) Toronto neighbourhood workforce/demographic concentrations & (ii) #SARSCov2 prevalence (cases/100k) identified in yesterday's thread.
Only a few sips of coffee/tea needed
(but this is no less striking)
2/ These data and observations *MUST* inform public policy on #SARSCov2/#COVI19, in my view.
3/ In my thread from yesterday, we examined % test positivity and cases/100k by neighbourhood in Toronto (for its 140 hoods) and then compared them to neighb'hood socioeconomic/demographic concentrations from census data to find (or not find) correlations.
A comprehensive, neighborhood-by-neighborhood review of #SARSCov2 prevalence/trends in the City of Toronto.
% positivity & cases, with weekly trends since Aug, AND:
*cross referenced with neighborhood census data*
The findings are incredible.
2/ Note: even if you are not in Toronto/Canada, I think you will find this data/analysis compelling, and universally applicable re #SARSCov2/#COVID19 learning and public policy implications.
Toronto’s diversity (>51% visible minority) makes it an interesting case study.
3a/ In this thread, I show/illustrate:
1. for Toronto’s 140 neighbourhoods (and groups of hoods, e.g. DT Core, Northwest), which have increasing/decreasing % pos & cases per 100k.
(Some peaked long before the Oct 10th restrictions. Others still increasing despite restrictions.)