🔴 If rules change in international airspace before you arrive e.g. #Gibraltar#Iceland et al - international law *doesn't change*.
You can't be forced to take an invasive test & threatened with non-entry. Medical procedure needs fully informed consent.
🔴 Pilots like the one on @Ryanair who threatened passengers with local police due to facemasks are employees of an airline, i.e. a PLC,
They have no authority on domestic or international laws other than legitimate passenger safety concerns on their craft.
🔴 IHR (2005), Chapter Five.
1. A State Party may require for public health purposes, on arrival or departure.
(a.) with regards to travellers, (iii.) a non invasive medical examination which is the least intrusive examination that would achieve the public health objective.
🔴 Article 43: Additional Health Measures.
1. "..such measures shall not be more restrictive of international traffic & not more invasive or intrusive to persons than reasonably available alternatives that would achieve the appropriate level of health protection".
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🔵 Since April 12th, we've encouraged customers to avoid the app & sign-in to a contact book which is their legal right to do so.
(contd.)
🔵 We view the use of the #NHS T&T app not solely as a public health measure, but to observe/measure compliancy for future use of #vaccinepassports in society.
Since May 17th, what we've seen 'go live' alongside international travel is very concerning...
🔵 As @EerkeBoiten pointed out, there's a separate 'Privacy Policy' re: COVID-status certification & your rights.
We *shouldn't* be seeing any categorisation re: vehicle reg, NI, employer, occupation, & also 'Special Categorisation' about physical/mental health condition.
🚨 Compelling travellers is undergo invasive medical procedure as a pre-requisite to departure, arrival, & re-entry to their country of origin is *illegal* @travelweekly
🔖 Chapter 3, Article 31, para.1 of the International Health Regulations (2005)
❌ "Invasive medical examination, vaccination, or other prophylaxis, shall not be required as a condition of entry of any traveller to the territory of a State Party"
✅ Article 32: Treatment of Travellers:
"State Parties shall treat travellers with respect for their dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms, and minimize any discomfort or distress associated with such measures"
Note the last line. Under the IHR (2005) these recommendations *do not exist* & *cannot* exist from EUA only & unlicensed, not fully tested jabs until the end of 2023.
Businesses are told *not* to make the QR code a pre-requisite of entry & another way to sign in *must be provided*, i.e. hardcopy, following GDPR regs.
Businesses have *no legal authority* to request your ID to check physical sign in details outside of the #NHS app
(contd.)
We believe that this #testandtrace system in place from 12th April could be switched to a #VaccinePassport scheme within months if the Govt are satisfied with levels of compliancy.
We are concerned re: Data Impact Risk Assessment of this updated system rolling out