I just posted the following to Nextdoor about #COVID19#vaccines and #NaturalImmunity. We'll see how long it lasts before they censor it just as they've repeatedly deleted other truthful information I've posted that is contrary to the political agenda being served:
I just saw this ad from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services on Nextdoor that concerns me because it communicates the message that if you've had SARS-CoV-2 infection, you won't acquire natural immunity, which is false.
I note that Nextdoor's community guidelines prohibit the spread of misinformation about COVID-19 and the vaccines, so I would like to inform members of my community that there are many studies indicating that infection confers a robust and long-lasting immunity.
To address the misinformation, here are some relevant findings from the scientific literature:
"[T]he first SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are designed to induce spike-specific immunity only, as spike antibodies have protective ability....
"It remains to be analyzed whether vaccinations can induce a long-lasting memory T-cell response to levels similar to what can be achieved by natural infection and whether the induced Spike-specific T cells play a role in the vaccine efficacy....
"Interestingly, the scientific literature does not report any evidence of COVID-19 patients who controlled the infection only by eliciting an antibody response in the absence of detectable SARS-CoV-2 T cells,...
"...while high titers of antibodies (even neutralizing antibodies) are present in severe disease....
"Hypothetically, the ability to mount a broad T-cell response against several epitopes located in different viral proteins [other than the spike protein] might be advantageous...
"...and might avoid the selection of mutated viruses to escape CD8 T-cell recognition....
"[The] vaccines can certainly not induce the broad T-cell repertoire as seen by the natural infection, and this Spike-focused T-cell induction might not be ideal."
-- Bertoletti et al., Oxford Open Immunology, February 23, 2021
"Data now suggest that the majority of infected individuals develop robust and long-lasting T cell immunity, which has implications for the durability of immunity and future vaccine approaches....
"That the majority of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were activated by non-S [non-spike protein] viral epitopes has implications for vaccination in populations that have experienced prior SARS-CoV-2 infections."
"Many people who have been infected with SARS-CoV-2 will probably make antibodies against the virus for most of their lives. So suggest researchers who have identified long-lived antibody-producing cells in the bone marrow of people who have recovered from COVID-19.
"The study provides evidence that immunity triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection will be extraordinarily long-lasting...."
#FactCheck
Claim: Johnson & Johnson's #COVID19#vaccine has been shown to be 100% effective at preventing hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19. (Source: Berkshire Vaccination Collaborative)
Available data from ongoing phase 3 clinical trials do not demonstrate these claimed benefits. Berkshire Vaccination Collaborative is spreading #VaccineMisinformation.
2/7
Risk of hospitalization was not a primary endpoint measured in the study. In a post hoc analysis, there were 2 hospitalizations in the vaccine group two weeks after vaccination, falsifying the claim that it is 100% effective at preventing hospitalization.
Data from clinical trials are limited and do not prove that the vaccines are effective for preventing hospitalization and death. The evidence that the Pfizer vaccine prevents hospitalization is of "low certainty" and for death "very low certainty".
The total number of hospitalizations in 2020 "with" (not necessarily FOR) #COVID19 is within the range of annual hospitalizations FOR #influenza estimated by the CDC. (Thread continues...)
h/t Marjorie, a member of my reader community
The CDC estimates between 140,000 and 810,000 hospitalizations occur annually for flu (it's a range because numbers vary widely year to year). cdc.gov/flu/about/burd…
This December 30 @nytimes article states that "more than 670,000 Americans have been hospitalized with the disease this year".
The @nytimes presents the figure of 60% as the most conservative of estimates, going up to 90% (which, absurdly, would put #SARSCoV2 at the contagiousness level of measles) when in fact scientists have also estimated that the #HerdImmunity threshold could be far lower.
... the #COVID19#vaccines that have received emergency use authorization have been adequately studied such that we have scientific proof that they have no potential to cause harm.
But you are the one who is wrong and irresponsibly spreading dangerous misinformation.
As @RobertKennedyJr rightly notes, we do not have adequate data from the trials to be able to meaningfully claim that they are "safe". The data do not show that they prevent severe disease, hospitalization, death, or transmission. We have no data on long-term effects.
Here is how the #COVID19#lockdown regime in my home state of #Michigan is engaging in institutionalized scientific fraud, justifying authoritarian measures on the basis of nonsensical anti-science policies resulting in uninterpretable data. (1/9)
Here is the #Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) "COVID-19 Standard Operating Procedures" dated September 2020: (2/9) michigan.gov/documents/mdhh…
First, it shows plainly that state health officials are equating any positive PCR test with a "COVID-19" case, even though the detection of viral RNA by itself does not tell you whether the person is infectious or has (or has ever had) the disease caused by #SARSCoV2. (3/9)