The panel discussion will be graced by Justice GS Patel, Judge, Bombay High Court;
Ajoy Mehta, Former Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra;
Dr. Anand Bang, Joint Director, SEARCH, Gadchiroli and
Dr. Rahela Khorakiwala, Lead, Vidhi Maharashtra.
Kelkar: I used to tell my grandchildren that if you want to see how to write, then read the economist. But now I will tell them to read this briefing book by @Vidhi_India
It is an elegantly written delightful book.
Kelkar: The third general reforms now have to be pertaining to the institutional reforms - legislature, judiciary and executive.
This now seems to be the consistent view.
Kelkar: The three or four areas I want to invite attention to is: 1. Litigation policy at central and state due to piling of cases.
Almost 50% cases the state is a litigant - either one side or both sides.
There has to be a policy on this.
Kelkar: When President Cinton became president - he set up committee under the VP for removal of the obsolete laws.
This was Centre and the State level.
The number of laws which were removed was astounding.
Sardesai: there is a mother of a friend 85 yr old, she is immobile. I called #BMC for vaccinating her.
I was told there is no policy as of now for #doortodoor vaccination.
Justice Gautam Patel responds: The door to door vaccination shouldn’t be in the court in the first place. It comes to court when the court asks #BMC why can it not be done.
Justice Patel: BMC has been applauded for managing the public health crisis in a densely populated city like Mumbai.
It is possible because they pivoted the situation by innovating in a short time.
Justice Patel: It is true that laws could have sunset clause. But what is important is for the administration to have room to innovate and maneuver in the the existing laws. Let us not over regulate.
Justice Patel: Who stopped the BMC from going door to door? What has stopped them? You have a target audience. You know whom you want to vaccinate. Come up with a policy.
Ajoy Mehta: Let me think of it this way - instead of saying why should this be taken to court, let me ask why does court have to intervene in this?
My submission is the solution to every problem is not in law.
Mehta: I won’t say meddlesome. Each institution has an instrument and they have to do that job. It will be a sad day if the institutions start doing jobs of the other institution.
Justice Patel: I just want to say that if Mr Mehta wants to call judiciary meddlesome then my presence should not bother.
Judiciary needs to hear it sometimes. If that is the sentiment then that should come out.
Mehta: I am not saying meddlesome. I am saying over a saw, I am choosing a hammer.
Justice Patel: The point of discord is failure to govern will bring in judiciary. But constantly seeking the executive to up its game is bring best against good.
Mehta: We need to define what is failure?
In a hospital whose roof is leaking, is it failure? Yes it is. But that village has no water, isn’t that not failure? Yes it is. We have to choose which is the failure to respond to.
Dr Bang: I do not believe that if a law cannot be implemented then there need not be created. The rationale should be to follow the principles for laws.
Dr Bang: There are 5 criteria for applying any law.
1. Whether science or law has a solution to something? 2. What is the burden of that problem? 3. What is severity of the problem? 4. Do people consider it a critical problem? 5. What is the cost effective solution?
Sardesai: Are you calling for streamlining of laws? So that there is fewer laws and more ad hoc decisions?
Dr Rahela Khorakhiwala: Having more laws is not necessarily a good thing. What we are saying that come to the community levels. Especially for public health laws.
Justice Patel: For many of us who have to do this, it is frustrating that we cannot resume the normal functioning.
When you have courts have for whatever reason, sitting only for limited hours, for limited class, there is something tragic happening.
Justice Patel: There is a requirement of justice in a testamentary cases.
We have to find a mechanism to work around it.
Are we going to get to zero cases anywhere?
Dr Khorakiwala: Also this is a view of the high court, we still do not know what is happening at the district courts. There is issue of electrification, internet, etc.
Justice Patel: No I am saying this is a problem which seeps to the lowest denominator courts.
There are serious infrastructure problems. And why should this be considered as two separate sides - executive and judiciary?
Mehta: Digitization is the answer no doubt. But that is the only solution.
Because it is not just doing something physically to convert into digital format.
Because there will be cloud space issues, people to feed in data, electricity, etc.
The entire system needs relook.
Dr Bang: What we are experiencing in Gadchiroli is vaccination hesitancy and diagnosis hesitancy.
There is a govt car which roams around looking for people to be tested and vaccinated.
Dr Bang: There was an incident of Palghar which had caused deaths of some people. There had been three different figures of death.
What I am trying to say is if you are not on the radar, you can come and go, there will be no blip.
Justice Patel: The #SupremeCourt e-courts committee is looking at simplifying digital usage.
But as Mr Mehta said, if we do not discard the redundant details, it will not be effective.
Justice Patel: What is the limited extent which requires attention and change? Public and Private are divided. One is considered like a dark side of the moon. Why? It is part of public health system.
Justice Patel: And this also needs to consider the mental health law. The language that is used in some of the orders...
Calling it mental defect. It is a task and it needs to be looked at.
Sardesai: I am going to take a question here for Justice Patel. Why does #BombayHighCourt not have audio video recording like the Supreme Court and other courts?
Justice Patel: Ok I think what he means is live streaming.
Justice Patel: what cases need to be live streamed and what not is a different discussion.
But I am going to ask why do you want it? It is not evidence. It cannot be used anywhere. What can be used is the court orders and transcripts. So why increase the digital junk.
Sardesai: This was a very fruitful, interesting discussion possible because of Zoom. Over TV, of course most of the discussions become noise. I hope #Vidhi comes up with some media laws. (Laughs)
[School fees] Allahabad High Court will shortly hear a matter regarding regulation of school fees in private educational institutions across Uttar Pradesh.
Court: Mr AG and ASG, we have across in the last few days, particularly after the cyclone hit the coast, we have come across various newspaper reports which says that the coastline is full of filth and garbage left behind.
AG Anil Kumbhakoni submits that the State of Maharashtra will not wait for Centre’s approval. They will proceed with implementing the door to door vaccination without centre’s approval.
AG: We want to do it on an experimental basis. And we propose to start it from Pune District.
As we had conducted a drive for the students going abroad. Taking the experience from that, we will do the same.
We will invite invitations from citizens.
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear a plea by Yoga guru Baba Ramdev who sought a stay on the proceedings in multiple case lodged against him in various states over his remarks on allopathy in which he criticised doctors over the treatment protocol for #Covid19 #ramdev@IMAIndiaOrg
Ramdev sought clubbing of FIRs and transferpf cases to Delhi and also prays for no coercive action in meantime and restrain Indian Medical Association from filing further FIR on same cause of action.
#SupremeCourt bench led by Justice Ashok Bhushan to deliver judgment on a plea seeking directions to the Centre & States to provide ex-gratia #compensation of Rs. 4 lakh to the family members of those who have succumbed to the COVID-19 disease and post #COVID19 complications
The bench while reserving judgment had sought to know from the Central government on whether the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) had considered the prayer for payment of such ex-gratia payments and rejected the same.