#SupremeCourt to deliver judgment at 2 PM on a plea moved by @Facebook India's head Ajit Mohan challenging the notice issued by the Delhi Assembly's Peace and Harmony Committee in relation to its inquiry into the 2020 Delhi Riots @secondatticus#DelhiRiots#DelhiAssembly
Senior Advocate Harish Salve had asserted on behalf of Mohan that Facebook India cannot be compelled to speak before the Peace and Harmony Committee and that the top Court should uphold the right to silence #SupremeCourt#facebook#Delhiriots
The judgment will be delivered by a bench of Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Dinesh Maheshwari and Hrishikesh Roy #SupremeCourt
[Facebook India Head vs Delhi Legislative Assembly]
Justice SK Kaul: technological age has created digital platforms which can be uncontrolled at times. One such creation is of intermediaries which states that they have no control over the content posts. By the reas
Justice SK Kaul:on of the content it has wide ranging influence. Facebook is one such corp
Justice Kaul: less informed individuals may not verify information from leaders and take it as gospel truth.
Justice Kaul: we have divided submissions under privilege, free speech and legislative competence. We have noted the developments which took place world wide
Justice Kaul: we have taken note of legislative function which is only one of the function. Investigative of a social complicated problem is too under its domain (audio disrupted again)... Justice Kaul on mute
SC: We have found that legislative functions is just one of the functions that is there. We have talked about the power of the Committee to look into such social problems. We are not impressed by the argument that the GNCTD act be read in isolation.
SC: On legislative competence, because of pervasive impact of rights, the committee has right to seek information on any matter related to peace and harmony without encroaching in any subject of 7th schedule
SC: Emphasis is also laid on transparency of proceedings. We would not like to say anything more on this subject as it is in reference before.
SC: The statements made in the press conference cannot be brushed aside. It was said Facebook with vested interest in Delhi riots.... these statements should not have been made and can give rise to apprehension in mind of petitioner
SC: The statements made in the press conference by respondents were hardly conducive to the proceedings before the committee.
SC: We have analysed the press conference in detail. We are of the view that committee cannot don the role of a prosecuting agency and direct filing of supplementary chargesheet. the committee has to keep this in mind so that another litigation does not begin
SC: Members and non members can be asked to appear before the committee. The statements of the chairperson has led to apprehension in mind of @secondatticus
SC: Assembly admittedly does not have the power to legislate under the issues which fall under the domain of union govt. However objective of peace and harmony go beyond law and order and police.
SC: Any representative of the petitioner can deny answering any question by the committee if its falls within the prohibited domains. #supremecourt
SC: We have written a postscript on the manner in which the proceedings were held in wake of the COVID times and how there was time period of 4 months between reserving the order and delivery of judgment
SC: Often judgments are cited from the privy council and earlier years. in a technological age like ours a junior is only required to collate all judgments in a nice spiral binding. if a question of law arises, the judgments should only be related to that.
SC: multiple judgments on one point of law is not needed. Judgments are becoming more complex and verbose due to the amount of judgments which are being cited. This is all the more reasons for better time management.
SC: We do not doubt that lawyers think on their feet, but they need to think before they get on their feet
[BREAKING] Delhi Assembly can examine Delhi Riots but cannot don role of prosecuting agency: Supreme Court refuses to quash notices by Delhi Assembly to @FacebookIndia Head Ajit Mohan
[Covid 19] Allahabad High Court to hear the suo moto COVID 19 matter shortly.
Earlier, the court had directed the government to inform the court about the steps being taken to upgrade the primary and secondary health care centers.
Manish Goyal, AAG: We were directed to file the status report about future planning and steps to tackle the pandemic. We have filed an affidavit in this regard.
Delhi High Court to hear plea seeking direction to Twitter India to appoint Resident Grievance Officer under IT Rules, 2021. On last date of hearing, Court had asked the social media platform when it would appoint such an officer
#BombayHighCourt is hearing two petitions assailing the Information Technology (Guidelines for intermediaries and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021.
Hearing before Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni.
Sr Adv Darius Khambatta for one of the petitioners, which is a digital news portal, states there are amendments which are required to be carried out in that petition.
Supreme Court to shortly hear a plea challenging the provisions dealing with restitution of conjugal rights since "court-mandated restitution of conjugal rights amounts to a "coercive act" on part of the state." #supremecourt#conjugalrights
The plea states that such a direction for restitution of conjugal rights is an infringement of one's sexual & decisional autonomy, right to privacy & dignity, and thus a violation of the right to life under Article 21 #supremecourt
Plea seeks Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act and Section 22 of the Special Marriage Act to be struck down. Additionally, the enforcement of restitution of conjugal rights as provided for under Order XXI Rule 32 and 33 of the CPC is also sought to be struck down
Ghaziabad Video: Karnataka HC to shortly begin hearing a plea filed by Manish Maheshwari, an employee of Twitter Communications India Private Ltd challenging notice issued under Section 41A of CrPC.