The #GPDPR#GPdata upload will still be going ahead, but it will no longer be starting on 1 September 2021 - the programme will have to meet 3 (or 4) #tests first instead:
We'll let you do the diff between the "criteria" laid out in the announcement on @NHSDigital website and the "key areas of work" listed in the letter to GPs from @Jochurchill4 this afternoon:
There's clearly still some confusion around what some of the words mean(!) and no commitment to write to every patient once things have been fixed...
...which is odd, as you'd think the Government would WANT to tell patients what it has done (once it's all been done, and been *seen* to be done) to demonstrate the #trustworthiness of the new measures like #TRE-only and offer people the chance to opt back in.
If our data is...
...so valuable - some say £10 billion a year - then what is the cost of writing to each individual named patient compared with that?
Sending a #JunkMail leaflet as in 2014, or doing web stuff as in 2021 doesn't come close to what we've said is necessary.
For the past 8 years.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
..entirely normal use of #commercial software & software services, for which the #NHS body is the #DataController. Apart from when that software goes wrong, I don't believe many would have concerns about this.
Then there are #commercial providers of #NHS services, about which...
They should avoid "small, poorly ventilated public places for more than 15 mins", "public transport", "visiting others indoors" & "shouting, singing or talking loudly" 🤔
Hmm. I don't think anyone is claiming @Facebook is *solely* responsible for #antivax#misinformation, but it cannot be disputed the #platforms have been major contributors.
...imply that what it is doing is helping 'solve the problem' (even if it is!) simply underlines @Facebook's chronic lack of #accountability & #SelfAwareness.
"Look how good we are for clearing up some of the sewage we pump out" is more an insult than any sort of justification.
Hmm. Knowing a little about newspapers, it's quite possible David himself didn't write the headline and blurb - though the thrust of his review is clear, the direct reference to sex as a "social construct" is Joyce's quote:
I'm not so sure that isn't a #StrawMan; an extreme position being characterised as if it were the nub of the debate. I don't know, but can't imagine many would vehemently disagree with these commonly held definitions:
#SnakeOil salesmen have and always will always prey on the vulnerable, but the "#DisinformationDozen" (and others) appear to have turned it into an industry: