Hmm. Knowing a little about newspapers, it's quite possible David himself didn't write the headline and blurb - though the thrust of his review is clear, the direct reference to sex as a "social construct" is Joyce's quote:
I'm not so sure that isn't a #StrawMan; an extreme position being characterised as if it were the nub of the debate. I don't know, but can't imagine many would vehemently disagree with these commonly held definitions:
They were generous, tolerant & open - explaining to someone with no knowledge the many challenges of #transition, including living with an...
...#identity other than the one officially recorded about them at birth. So it has been with increasing dismay that I've seen the emergence and polarisation of the '#TransWars' in recent years - fueled in large part, it seems, by attempts to redefine words and (mis)represent...
...others' views or positions.
I'm a man and I know folk who are both #transgender & #transexual, #nonbinary too. I sometimes get people's #pronouns wrong; like many I respond in default 'binary' ways to visual and auditory cues. (If I'm honest, my #gaydar is pretty crap too...
...possibly because other folk's sexual orientation has never really bothered me. People are people; what business is it of mine who someone loves or is attracted to?)
But like David, I respect people's choices and am happy to call people by whatever name or pronoun they want...
One of the lessons of #HumanRights - and #identity! - campaigning, though, is that different rights and different people's rights are often in #tension. And that 'doubling down' on this never solves things...
One of the most powerful lessons I've learned from @PeterTatchell is his statement "Their rights are our rights". Trans people are NOT trying to "destroy women", to quote Joyce, and operating on the assumption that every transgender woman is a sexual predator is both blatantly...
...#phobic and intellectually dishonest, not to mention on logical thin ice. (Is the fear of a woman with a penis, or rather of a man *pretending* to be a woman - who, by definition, isn't transgender?)
Rather than fighting each other, would it not be better to fight TOGETHER...
...for the rights we all need?
EVERYONE deserves #safety, and #recognition, and #respect - but the more things descend into name-calling and are framed as #ZeroSum battles, the less likely those all become.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The #GPDPR#GPdata upload will still be going ahead, but it will no longer be starting on 1 September 2021 - the programme will have to meet 3 (or 4) #tests first instead:
We'll let you do the diff between the "criteria" laid out in the announcement on @NHSDigital website and the "key areas of work" listed in the letter to GPs from @Jochurchill4 this afternoon:
They should avoid "small, poorly ventilated public places for more than 15 mins", "public transport", "visiting others indoors" & "shouting, singing or talking loudly" 🤔
Hmm. I don't think anyone is claiming @Facebook is *solely* responsible for #antivax#misinformation, but it cannot be disputed the #platforms have been major contributors.
...imply that what it is doing is helping 'solve the problem' (even if it is!) simply underlines @Facebook's chronic lack of #accountability & #SelfAwareness.
"Look how good we are for clearing up some of the sewage we pump out" is more an insult than any sort of justification.
#SnakeOil salesmen have and always will always prey on the vulnerable, but the "#DisinformationDozen" (and others) appear to have turned it into an industry:
In his introduction to "#ThePlan", @OliverDowden says he'll "shortly publish a #plan for a pro-growth data regime" 🤔
If he has an ACTUAL plan, or frankly a clue, then why not just #publish the damn thing? Why all the waffle?
Hand-wavy platitudes like these 👇 ain't worth Jack:
Just so we're clear, this "#Plan" is supposed to "start a #conversation" about "#TenTechPriorities" that @DCMS published on a "shorthand stories"(?) page that DOESN'T ONCE MENTION PEOPLE'S #RIGHTS!!