🧵1/ This thread is about a trend advocating for preventing Omar al-Bashir, wanted for crimes against humanity, from being sent to the ICC. It's a fantastic example of how artificially amplified and manipulated trends pretend to be grassroots sentiment #Disinformation#Sudan
2/ firstly, this shouldn't be taken lightly. The warrants against al-Bashir include the worst charges, from extermination, torture, and intentional targeting of civilians. Up to 500,000 are thought to have been killed as a result of the Darfur genocide (although figures vary).
3/ The trend translates as 'Surrending al-Bashir is an insult to Sudan'. It started trending on the evening of the 11th August. Then, @sabqorg an Arabic newspaper, ran a story about the trend saying it reflected 'popular (Gulf) outrage' about al-Bashir's plight #disinformation
4/ But is it really a reflection of popular outrage? Let's look in more detail at the hashtag. This analysis involves around 11,000 interactions taken from 11th-13th August involving around 7600 unique Twitter accounts. #disinformation#ICC#Sudan
5/ Firstly, who are the big influencers on the hashtag. Well it, seems they are the following, s_hm2030, a_albander, cressfiles, mjathlani, faljubairi, monther72, 5aldi Those who follow my threads may recognize these names. They are prominent on many dodgy gulf trends
6/ Now maybe many of those sharing this opinion genuinely believe it, though the narrative seems to be generally the same. It's a breach of state sovereignty and 'true Arabs' should reject this Western imposition of law/rules. In other words, Bashir should face justice in Sudan
7/ But can this same group of influencers, who often engage in fake trends, and many of whom recently weighed in on the Tunisia issue - really be misinterpreted as a good barometer for Arab public opinion? Well the manipulation present would indicate - no -Read on #disinformation
8/ The network graph below shows areas of manipulation (circled in red). These areas indicate clusters of fake accounts boosting the hashtag. They are defined by sockpuppet accounts all using the same app (Twitter Web App) to automatically RT a specific account #disinformation
9/ For example, The following community are accounts retweeting ANOTHER hacked verified account, this one belongs to @LeighEBuchanan the editor for @Inc magazine (who have over 2 million Twitter followers). It's been hacked by some mobile phone vendor in Saudi. Drop 'em a line!
11/ This cluster is similar, hundreds of sockpuppets retweeting marketing accounts advertising things like massages - also with Saudi whatsapp numbers. Check out the @TheChadSakada for a massage, and some Omar al-Bashir Spam! Total sockpuppets in the cluster, around 529. #disinfo
12/ Similarly, in this cluster there are around 144 sockpuppet accounts. Shout out to @steveknott020 whose interests include selling phones and Omar al-Bashir spam
13/ This is an interesting cluster, as it's embedded within the main network and retweeting what appears to be a real verified account mjathlani. I estimate this cluster to include between 300-358 sockpuppets. They mostly RT the same accounts and tweet generic content #disinfo
14/ So the TL;DR is that there around 1029 sockpuppets boosting the trend advocating not surrending al-Bashir to the ICC. It is unclear how many of these boosted trends are done by opportunistic marketing agencies, or they are enlisted to boost a trend. Some clearly are RT
15/ certain messages in a way that appears to be to increase the prominence of the hashtag. Generally though, the same group of influencers we often see on disinfo trends appear to be very prominent. The Cressfiles account is an interesting one. A related incarnation
16/ Cresstove was suspended by Twitter soon after it was active in a big disinformation campaign. Anyway, While @sabqorg report this as public opinion, at least 14% are sockpuppets, and I'll wager this trend reflects top-down policy (even if many agree). #disinformation
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵1/ Good morning! I gathered more data over night on the hashtag 'Qatar Revolts', which is exaggerating the scale of protests in Qatar. Approx 1040 of 10500 accounts in the sample are probably fake. There is also at least one other hacked verified account #disinformation
2/ The network graph shows a fairly independent community in the top right quadrant. If you zoom in you'll see a lot of the accounts boosting the hashtag are retweets of the account @JesseCsincsak .... #cybersecurity#disinformation
3/ Now at first glance @JesseCsincsak is a company called JCK - even the name seems to kind of match the handle. Clever. But that's a ruse, the account actually promotes almalka_store. The account is hacked, and belongs to Jesse Csinscak a pro snowboarder &ABC Bachorlette winner!
[Thread] 1/ Here is another #manipulation thread (I'll try make it shorter, but it's got some juicy nuggets). This is an analysis of the hashtag "Qatar Revolts". We've seen such hashtags on Lebanon, Iraq, Tunisia etc. It's a common hashtag during *widespread* demonstrations.
2/ For context again There were/are some protests in Qatar, mostly by some members of the Al Marra tribe who have been excluded from the upcoming Shura Elections. For more background on statelessness in Qatar, see this AI report for example: refworld.org/docid/483e27ab…
3/ As this graph shows, the two circled communities are worth further examination. Both represent accounts being retweeted heavily by accounts using an identical application (in this case, Twitter Web App). Who are they retweeting? See next > #disinformation#Qatar
[Thread] 1/ This thread is on Qatar's long-awaited upcoming Shura elections, and manipulation on the hashtag 'elections for the Shura council'. I analyzed around 18000 interactions involving around 8600 unique accounts. #disinformation#deception
2/ The sample is from the last two days, and generally encompasses the majority of activity on the hashtag. (Of course the presence of manipulation doesn't discount any of the important issues being raised about electoral fairness and inclusion, but I am focusing on manipulation)
3/ Firstly. There is clear, unequivocal manipulation going on. If you look at the network graph below, it shows a large hub of accounts (green block), along with a separate pinkish constellation. The pinkish constellation shows an account being retweeted hundreds of times. Now..
[Thread]1/ As mentioned before, but delayed slightly due to food poisoning 🤢, what follows is an analysis of the hashtag "Strong Turkiye" which began trending as a response to the hashtag 'help turkey' on 2nd August. As expected, it shows signs of manipulation and co-ordinated
2/ activity. For some context, the hashtag help Turkey, which I analysed previously, sprung up as a response to wildfires in Turkey. The hashtag prompted an angry response from the Turkish authorities, & the hashtags "we don't need help" & "strong Turkey" emerged. #disinformation
3/ This sample includes around 20,000 interactions involving 9100 unique accounts extracted on 2nd August. First up, signs of deliberate signal boosting of a hashtag by generating high volumes of retweet and mentions. If you look below, you will see three clusters/communities
🧵 [Thread] 1/ This thread is about some attempts to manipulate the Arabic hashtag "boycott elections". The trend refers to upcoming Shura council elections in Qatar. It's currently the number one trend in Qatar. There is clear manipulation + outside influence. Read on>
2/ First, while the topic of Shura elections has generated much debate, it is clearly going to be an issue of international scrutiny. So at these times looking at social media commentary and manipulation will be key, especially with democratic backsliding in the region #Qatar
3/ It's not a big hashtag. Only around 300 interactions from around 250 unique accounts. However, the most retweeted account is a digital marketing account that literally offers trend promoting services. > noof30304. 100 RTs and 40 likes cost 10 Riyals! This account
[Thread] 1/ Good evening, afternoon, or morning all! Tonight's thread is on #Turkey, and it will be a big one. Many have commented on the massive hashtag "Help Turkey" that rapidly reached 2.5 million tweets today. Read on for an in depth Twitter analysis > #Disinformation
2/ 1st, some brief context. The hashtag "help turkey" involved people calling for international help to combat Turkey's wildfires. Images like the one below were common. The tweet storm prompted reactionary nationalistic hashtags including "Strong Turkey" & "We Dont Need Help"
3/ Some felt the message being generated on the hashtag was designed to make Turkey look weak, incompetent and desperate. This, coupled with the scale of the campaign, suggested a possible influence operation. To be clear though. The hashtag had many real users. See below.