Very excited to share our most recent publication about #CovidVaccine effectiveness, just published today by the IVY network. Especially relevant in light of today’s news about #boosters (spoiler - I’m skeptical about the need for boosters for all). 🧵
➡️We looked specifically at vaccine effectiveness for preventing #COVID19 hospitalizations.
➡️We did NOT look at asymptomatic infections, or infections that did not result in hospitalization.
➡️Fully vaccinated = received 2nd dose of vaccine > 14 days prior to hospitalization
What we found:
➡️Vaccine effectiveness (VE) for preventing #COVID19 hospitalizations was 86% overall.
➡️Vaccine effectiveness was sustained for 6 months after full immunization - strikingly illustrated in this figure:
➡️VE was overall lower for immunocompromised patients - 63% vs 90% in non-immunocompromised
➡️VE for high-risk patients (age > 65, immunocompromised, or w/ multiple comorbidities) also seemed to be sustained over time, but the immunocompromised group needs to be studied further
Limitations:
➡️Time period = up to 6 months post-vax, so we still don’t know if VE wanes after that (we’re continuing the study to find out)
➡️The #DeltaVariant was not the dominant variant until mid-June. While VE was similar in June & July, further surveillance is needed
This leaves me a bit skeptical about boosters because so far, it seems that although protection against mild illness wanes, vaccines remain highly effective at preventing hospitalization.
We would prevent many more cases of severe illness if we focused on vaccinating the unvaccinated instead of boosters. Great thread on this from @EpiEllie here:
That being said, VE is lower among specific populations, leaving them more vulnerable. We need to examine how to better protect our immunocompromised patients in particular, whether it’s by using boosters or otherwise.
The study continues and there’s more to come, including evaluating VE over a longer period of time, and a closer look at immunocompromised patients. It’s been such a privilege to work with such an awesome group of investigators & contribute to this work.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Most young women I’ve admitted to the #ICU for #COVID19 have been #pregnant. Pregnancy is indeed a risk factor for more severe COVID illness, but the messaging about #pregnancy, COVID & #vaccines has led to a lot of confusion and preventable illness. Let’s break it down. 🤰🏽🧵
The reason I pretty much always hear from pregnant women for not getting vaccinated is, understandably, not wanting to put their pregnancy & their baby at any potential risk from taking a new & seemingly unfamiliar vaccine.
But forgoing vaccination exposes mom & baby to a much bigger risk - the known, real, significant risk of getting a severe #COVID19 infection. Both @acog & @MySMFM recommend that pregnant people get the #CovidVaccine in order to reduce that risk.
Thanks @CNN for sharing this story on @UCLAHealth's collaboration with @LAOpera! In this program, opera performers lead #COVID19 survivors through breathing and singing workshops - it's an innovative (and fun!) adjunct to pulmonary rehab.
What does #opera have to do with pulmonary rehab? Well, would it be surprising to know that some of the work we do in pulmonary rehab is quite similar to the #breathing exercises opera singers do? The opera stars just happen to be doing them on an elite level.
For example, diaphragmatic breathing, which we use as a technique to help increase tidal volume, is also used by singers to increase endurance and help them sing longer on a single breath.
Important questions about the type of ethical decision-making that needs to happen when resources become scarce - a situation no one wants to be in, but I worry may again become inevitable as #COVID19 cases continue to rise.
Should #vaccinated patients be prioritized over unvaccinated, all else being equal? I don’t think so, no matter how frustrating this is. Many unvaccinated are victims of misinformation. Also, if we did this, then where else do we draw lines related to personal health behaviors?
What about HCWs? When we were making our crisis standards of care document, there were discussions about the ethics of giving HCWs a tie breaker, all other things being equal. The rationale was that if they got better, they could go back to work & help others, maximizing benefit.
Honored to present at combined medicine & surgery grand rounds @UCLAHealth today & a privilege to highlight the incredible work done by the UCLA #COVID19 front line. Also packed in a review of the evidence basis for COVID therapeutics & discussed COVID recovery.
A lot to cover, and admittedly, I haven’t been that nervous about a presentation in a long time. I’ll share some slides here, starting with a summary of #COVID19 therapeutics.
Reviewing the body of evidence is always a task, even if the last time you did it was a week ago. You’ll get >100,000 results in PubMed if you search for #COVID19. In one year, there are about as many results for COVID as there are for influenza over 30 years 😳
Still getting the hang of Twitter chatting but...
A2 - start with brushing off your journal club #skillz! There are so many points to make here in terms of identifying confounders and bias, but I'll start w/ one I get asked about a lot - immortal time bias! #ATSChat
A2 - Immortal time = period of time during which, due to study design, the study outcome cannot occur. Occurs when there’s a difference between the timing of entrance into the study cohort & timing of the exposure. Exposure = the treatment being assessed. #ATSChat (2)
A2 - This can bias the results in favor of the exposure (ie treatment) group ➡️ immortal time BIAS. #atschat (3)
Just published in @bmj_latest, an update to our @WHO living guideline on drugs for #COVID19 – this update focuses on #remdesivir & was informed by the results of 4 trials w/7,333 participants – ACTT-1, SOLIDARITY, Spinner (JAMA), & Wang (Lancet). tinyurl.com/y4svlcyn
Summary: based on currently available data, there is insufficient evidence that #remdesivir improves patient-important outcomes ➡️ thus, a conditional (weak) recommendation against the use of remdesivir in hospitalized patients with #COVID19.
A conditional, or weak, recommendation against #remdesivir means that, based on current data, the undesirable effects probably outweigh the desirable effects, but substantial uncertainty exists. With this in mind, we very much felt that trials of remdesivir should continue.