We all know that the Allan Inquiry was just a way for the UCP/CAPP govt to reinforce its msg that the interests of the O&G corps and the interests of Albertans are identical. 1/
Hence, whatever frustrates the profit-making projets of Enbridge, TC, Shell, Cenovus, et al. is "anti-Albertan" (could not possibly be in the interests of Albertans). 2/
Being propaganda, it lacks any sense of irony. Recommendation #1 ("Transparency and Accountability"), e.g., is like stand-up comedy for anyone who follows AB govt spending on promotion of the oil sands. 3/
Canadian Energy Centre, anyone? A govt corporation set up to be exempt from freedom of information requirements? 4/
Or the spending across multiple ministries and govt offices on promotion of the oil sands to investors for which there is no line item reporting, so it can't be calculated? 5/
Or the universities that refuse to make public the research funding they receive from fossil fuel companies and industry associations? 6/
Or the Impact Benefit Agreements negotiated secretly, band-by-band so that Indigenous communities cannot organized collectively to leverage better deals with the resource extraction companies? 7/
How about the industry financing of petroturf organizations like Canada Action, that doesn't have to be reported? (Ever wonder where the slick websites and the swag come from?) 8/
Closed door meetings between industry lobbyists and government officials where they decide on regulations and write climate policy? You think the public has an interest in knowing about that, Mr. Allan? 8/
I could go on. Perhaps others will pick up the thread. You want transparency and accountability, Minister Savage? Canadian researchers have a long list of needed reforms ready for you. 9/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/ UAlberta wasn’t created overnight; it was built into a top 5 Canadian university by decades of public investment. It is the people’s university, and the people have every right to the best educational opportunities available.
3/ I’m not going to sugar-coat it: @UAlberta is being dismantled. A whole lot of parts are being taken out and tossed away.
Mary Ann Hitt reminds us that 12 yrs ago, climate & env health activists were told that the US would also be reliant on coal for electricity--just as we are told today that demand for oil will continue to grow. 2/n
The US relied on coal for 50% of its electricity. Today, that figure is down to 20% and falling. It can be done, when there is political will to mobilize the necessary resources. 3/n
This is hugely important policy intervention, and one that I support. The Kenney govt and the oil and gas industry are lobbying the Liberal govt for a $30 BILLION subsidy for CCS R&D & implementation. 1/n @JonathanWNV@cafreeland@350Canada@CCPA_BC
For the past 20 years, CCS and technology development, more generally, has been the central pillar of the "climate" policy of AB govts and big business. Why? 2/n
This promise of future technological "solutions" permits govts to avoid making needed economic reforms and investments now. 3/n
I’m a slow thinker (like slow food), so it took a while for my answer to percolate. Warning: This is a long answer to Ryan’s question! I’ll start with a story. 2/n @uabpols@NoUofA42morrow@ParklandInst
I grew up in Saskatchewan. After I was hired at @UAlberta in 1991, I went to visit my parents in Saskatoon, by bus. I like to sit at the front, so I can see the road ahead, and the span of the landscape. 3/n
That the Feb 2021 AB budget sets aside $136m for the "Alberta Jobs Now" program is sadly laughable, given, first, that the sum itself is completely inadequate to the task, and, second, 1/n #abpoli#ableg#abpse#Alberta
600 jobs gone at #UCalgary. 750 jobs gone at #UAlberta. Plus the other 19 public PSEIs (for which I don't have figures). And these are only the jobs we can count, and don't include the ones that will be lost due to the newest budget cuts. 3/n