"It would be irresponsible to divert any student tuition or Campus Alberta Grant funding for this purpose."
Red herring. Nobody asked you to. Capital fund-raising? Partnership with Primavera? Read the proposal. #UAlberta@AmarjeetSohiYEG#EdmontonHeritage
Where is the [university's] review under its "Preservation . . . policy" of the Ring Houses' historical value? Question not answered. No review? #UAlberta#RingHouseCoalition
Does the President agree that the University of Alberta has a duty to consult with faculty,
students, staff, and neighbouring communities about plans to develop university properties and that affect heritage buildings and spaces? @BillFlanagan
We all know that the Allan Inquiry was just a way for the UCP/CAPP govt to reinforce its msg that the interests of the O&G corps and the interests of Albertans are identical. 1/
Hence, whatever frustrates the profit-making projets of Enbridge, TC, Shell, Cenovus, et al. is "anti-Albertan" (could not possibly be in the interests of Albertans). 2/
Being propaganda, it lacks any sense of irony. Recommendation #1 ("Transparency and Accountability"), e.g., is like stand-up comedy for anyone who follows AB govt spending on promotion of the oil sands. 3/
2/ UAlberta wasn’t created overnight; it was built into a top 5 Canadian university by decades of public investment. It is the people’s university, and the people have every right to the best educational opportunities available.
3/ I’m not going to sugar-coat it: @UAlberta is being dismantled. A whole lot of parts are being taken out and tossed away.
Mary Ann Hitt reminds us that 12 yrs ago, climate & env health activists were told that the US would also be reliant on coal for electricity--just as we are told today that demand for oil will continue to grow. 2/n
The US relied on coal for 50% of its electricity. Today, that figure is down to 20% and falling. It can be done, when there is political will to mobilize the necessary resources. 3/n
This is hugely important policy intervention, and one that I support. The Kenney govt and the oil and gas industry are lobbying the Liberal govt for a $30 BILLION subsidy for CCS R&D & implementation. 1/n @JonathanWNV@cafreeland@350Canada@CCPA_BC
For the past 20 years, CCS and technology development, more generally, has been the central pillar of the "climate" policy of AB govts and big business. Why? 2/n
This promise of future technological "solutions" permits govts to avoid making needed economic reforms and investments now. 3/n
I’m a slow thinker (like slow food), so it took a while for my answer to percolate. Warning: This is a long answer to Ryan’s question! I’ll start with a story. 2/n @uabpols@NoUofA42morrow@ParklandInst
I grew up in Saskatchewan. After I was hired at @UAlberta in 1991, I went to visit my parents in Saskatoon, by bus. I like to sit at the front, so I can see the road ahead, and the span of the landscape. 3/n
That the Feb 2021 AB budget sets aside $136m for the "Alberta Jobs Now" program is sadly laughable, given, first, that the sum itself is completely inadequate to the task, and, second, 1/n #abpoli#ableg#abpse#Alberta
600 jobs gone at #UCalgary. 750 jobs gone at #UAlberta. Plus the other 19 public PSEIs (for which I don't have figures). And these are only the jobs we can count, and don't include the ones that will be lost due to the newest budget cuts. 3/n