Referring to children aged 5-11, the @nytimes quotes a top #CDC official saying that #COVID19 is "the eight-highest killer of kids in this age group over the past year". This is a deception. 1/7
nytimes.com/2021/10/26/us/…
We can see that it's a deception by turning to the source, a CDC presentation to the FDA also cited in the @nytimes article. In it is this slide ranking "66 COVID-19 associated deaths in children 5-11" in the past year among leading causes of death. 2/7
fda.gov/media/153508/d…
The data on top causes of death in children aged 5-11 comes from the CDC WONDER database. Here is what it shows for leading 15 causes of death for children aged 5-11 in 2019, the most recent year for which there is data. 3/7
wonder.cdc.gov/ucd-icd10.html
Notice that COVID-19 does not appear among the 15 leading causes of death, much less at position 8. Now look again at the CDC slide: it is comparing "COVID-19 associated deaths" with top UNDERLYING CAUSES of death.
4/7
A "COVID-19 associated" death is a death that occurs after diagnosis with COVID-19. It does NOT mean that COVID-19 was the underlying cause of death. It doesn't even necessarily mean that COVID-19 was a contributing factor. 5/7
So, we can see that the CDC has taken the total number of children who died after being diagnosed with COVID-19 and ranking that number with the leading underlying causes of death (UCOD) in 2019, then falsely presented the number 66 as though COVID-19 was the UCOD. 6/7
And the @nytimes, of course, unquestioningly parrots that CDC deception as though gospel truth. We're left with the question: How many children who died after being diagnosed with COVID-19 was it listed as the underlying cause of death, and why isn't the CDC saying? 7/7

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeremy R. Hammond

Jeremy R. Hammond Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jeremyrhammond

28 Oct
You cannot trust "public health" officials because they are willing to DELIBERATELY deceive you in furtherance of their policy goals. Here is a clear example from the Georgia Department of Public Health.
1/25
"Public health" officials want you to believe that the immunity conferred by #COVID19 #vaccines is twice as protective as #NaturalImmunity. Clicking the link, you see the claim "Vaccination Offers Higher Protection than Previous COVID-19 Infection":
cdc.gov/media/releases…
2/25 Image
Elsewhere, @CDCgov likewise explicitly claims that "Evidence is emerging that people get better protection by being fully vaccinated compared with having had COVID-19."
cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
3/25 Image
Read 25 tweets
28 May
I just posted the following to Nextdoor about #COVID19 #vaccines and #NaturalImmunity. We'll see how long it lasts before they censor it just as they've repeatedly deleted other truthful information I've posted that is contrary to the political agenda being served:
I just saw this ad from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services on Nextdoor that concerns me because it communicates the message that if you've had SARS-CoV-2 infection, you won't acquire natural immunity, which is false.
I note that Nextdoor's community guidelines prohibit the spread of misinformation about COVID-19 and the vaccines, so I would like to inform members of my community that there are many studies indicating that infection confers a robust and long-lasting immunity.
Read 16 tweets
6 Mar
#FactCheck
Claim: Johnson & Johnson's #COVID19 #vaccine has been shown to be 100% effective at preventing hospitalizations and deaths from COVID-19. (Source: Berkshire Vaccination Collaborative)

Ruling: FALSE.

1/7

getvaccinatedberkshires.org
Available data from ongoing phase 3 clinical trials do not demonstrate these claimed benefits. Berkshire Vaccination Collaborative is spreading #VaccineMisinformation.

2/7
Risk of hospitalization was not a primary endpoint measured in the study. In a post hoc analysis, there were 2 hospitalizations in the vaccine group two weeks after vaccination, falsifying the claim that it is 100% effective at preventing hospitalization.

3/7
Read 7 tweets
5 Mar
#FactCheck
Claim: @aaronecarroll in @nytimes says the Pfizer and Moderna #COVID19 #vaccines are "approved" and "proven" to prevent hospitalizations and death.

Ruling: FALSE. New York Times is spreading #VaccineMisinformation.

1/5

nytimes.com/2021/02/13/opi…
There are no FDA-approved vaccines for COVID-19.

2/5

fda.gov/media/144638/d…
Data from clinical trials are limited and do not prove that the vaccines are effective for preventing hospitalization and death. The evidence that the Pfizer vaccine prevents hospitalization is of "low certainty" and for death "very low certainty".

3/5

cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/6…
Read 5 tweets
9 Jan
The total number of hospitalizations in 2020 "with" (not necessarily FOR) #COVID19 is within the range of annual hospitalizations FOR #influenza estimated by the CDC. (Thread continues...)

h/t Marjorie, a member of my reader community
The CDC estimates between 140,000 and 810,000 hospitalizations occur annually for flu (it's a range because numbers vary widely year to year).
cdc.gov/flu/about/burd…
This December 30 @nytimes article states that "more than 670,000 Americans have been hospitalized with the disease this year".

(Note the precise "with" not "for" there.)

nytimes.com/2020/12/30/opi…
Read 8 tweets
6 Jan
This @nytimes article is disgracefully deceptive. It is pure #propaganda serving to manufacture consent for #COVID19 #vaccines by deceiving about what science tells us about the #HerdImmunity threshold and the vaccine's effect on transmission.
nytimes.com/2020/12/24/hea…
The @nytimes presents the figure of 60% as the most conservative of estimates, going up to 90% (which, absurdly, would put #SARSCoV2 at the contagiousness level of measles) when in fact scientists have also estimated that the #HerdImmunity threshold could be far lower.
For example, this preprint study estimated that the #HerdImmunity threshold could be as low as the range of 10% - 20%:
doi.org/10.1101/2020.0…
Read 16 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(