*Carbon Positive to Negative ratio. This metric measures carbon emissions against the emissions that the technology stops from entering the atmosphere.
Bitcoin mining using wasted methane has a CPNR of 16, 2nd only to solar with a CPNR of 20.
Renewable Grid Acceleration Potential: 3rd=
Behind Solar & Wind, = to utility-scale battery tech, #BTC mining ranked highly on 5 factors including 1. Reduced curtailment (affects economic viability of wind/solar) 2. Improved DR (Demand Response) 3. Smoother "Duck curve onramp"
6/6
Renewable Grid Acceleration Actual: 4th
(Behind Solar, Wind, Battery. Forecast to be equal with Utility Scale Battery Tech Q1 2026)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
3. No other existing technology is currently equipped to achieve this feat at this pace.
In short: Reducing methane emissions is the strongest lever we have to slow climate change. #Bitcoin mining is the fastest, most reliable hand we have upon that lever.
1/ At our #ESG ClimateTech fund, as part of our due diligence on #bitcoinmining, we examined the 7 Most #ESG arguments against #Bitcoin.
We expected to find a mixture of some true, some false, some grey
We were surprised to find all 7 were false. No grey areas
Here's the list
#ESG Argument 1. "Bitcoin competes with other users like hospitals, industry, residential users"
We found this to be unlikely in theory and practice because more users on the grid means more expensive wholesale electricity: which quickly makes #bitcoin mining unprofitable...
... What we did find evidence for was that when demand spiked, Bitcoin miners either voluntarily stop mining to preserve profitability, or executed pre-agreements with grid operators that taper power consumption down 99%.
Cutting methane emissions is the strongest lever we have to slow climate change now. #BTC mining is 1 of the 2 strongest hands we have to pull that lever
This'll be a surprising fact for many
So here's the most 7 common misconceptions that can stop people grasping it
1. “Burning methane releases CO2 which will increase our carbon emissions”.
The opposite is true. Both and CO2 and hydrocarbons like Methane (CH4) contribute to climate change.
However, over a 20 year period, Methane has 84x the warming effect of CO2.
Burning I T methane releases 2.75 T CO2.
So combusting methane to generate power decreases Carbon emissions by 84/2.75 = 31x.
While not investment advice, this is my opinion as a fund manager on the ESG case for Bitcoin after 2 months due diligence.
If you’re a manager of fund where #bitcoin is an investment candidate: failure to consider #BTC in the mix is gross negligence to your ESG obligations
If you’re a private investor, not investing in #BTC because it “uses energy” is like not investing in solar because it “uses energy” (coal in solar’s case) in it's manufacture: a 101 level cost-accounting fail. We must look at cost & benefit to asset an asset's net ESG position
First some background. As well as being an ESG fund manager, I’ve been an investing into novel technologies since 2000. Our first 2 funds focused on deep-tech solutions that remove carbon out of industrial processes. The impact of those technologies will be felt from 2035 onwards
BREAKING: Bitcoin mining can slash methane emissions by 2030.
Bitcoin mining can reduce our global emissions by up to 8% by 2030, simply by converting the world’s wasted and dangerous methane emissions into 80x less harmful emissions.
1/16
First some background. Around 20% of all our GHG emissions are from methane.
*This graph says 17.4%, but 2020-21 NASA data reveals that’s been underestimated. More on that later.
2/16
According to UNEP, “Human-caused methane emissions could be reduced up to 45% in 10 years. This would avert ~0.3°C of global warming by 2045. Methane reductions must [accompany] decarbonizing the energy system”
0/18
BREAKING: #BTC Mining can drive us to 70% renewables-based energy consumption by 2030.
To say "#BTC mining is good for the environment" is like saying "the sun is warm": a massive understatement. #BTCmining is our unexpected superhero. Here's how.
Here’s our energy mix today. While renewables are growing. However - so too is fossil fuels. It's still by far the major source of our global energy consumption.
Unless we have mostly renewable energy by 2030, the IPCC tells us we'll have runaway climate change. Not cool.
2/18
Here's the picture by line item. Coal has peaked. That’s good. Solar & wind is increasing. But not fast enough. If we look at their annual growth, it's alarming
Both solar & wind have slowing growth rates
eg: Solar slowed from 54%/year 10 years ago to 22%/year in 2020.