Chief Justice N V Ramana retires on 26 Aug, delivering during his tenure 29 lectures on guarding/improving #India’s laws & #Constitution. Yet, as @OfficialSauravD’s analysis found, he did not walk his talk, providing no hearings for vital cases. 1/11
Instead of 5-6 days, it’s been 159 days since a special petition was filed against #Karnataka HC ruling upholding govt hijab ban in state educational institutions. “It just shows #SupremeCourt is reluctant to hear the matter:” Fauzia Shakil, case lawyer. 2/11
2 requests to urgently list the #hijabban case were made before Chief Justice’s bench. On 26 April, Chief Justice Ramana said, “Wait for two days.” On 13 July, he said, “Wait till next week.” The case has not yet been listed. The #hijabban continues. 3/11
“This is dangerous. What happened to J&K sets a precedent for other states.” @AdnanAshrafMir of @JKPC_, petitioner challenge to abrogation of #Article370 in J&K, pending before #SupremeCourt for 1115 days. Last hearing: 2.5 yrs ago. 4/11
In April 2022, a petitioner in J&K #Article 370 abrogation case requested Ramana’s bench for a hearing. His answer: “We’ll see”. He said he would reconstitute 5-judge bench & hear case “after the vacation”, which ended on 10 July. There was no hearing. 5/11
The challenge to #electoralbonds, accused of corrupting #India’s electoral process has been pending for 1,816 days. The petitioners requested hearings at least 5-6 times & on 5 Apr 2022 Justice Ramana said he would “take it up”. 6/11
“The SC said the petition raises ‘weighty issues which have a tremendous bearing on the electoral process’. So I ask, do these weighty issues not warrant an urgent hearing? I am sad & disappointed. We’ll keep trying:” @JagdeepChhokar of @adrspeaks. 7/11
Journalist @ShyamMeeraSingh, one of many petitioners who challenged the anti-terror law #UAPA, says it is “not entirely unexpected” that the #Supreme Court has not heard the case since the first—and last—hearing 1,105 days ago. 8/11
“I can’t go abroad & nor can I apply for a government job—not that I want to. There are small mercies every now & then, but overall, I have no hope in the judiciary. The entire judiciary is compromised, more so the lower judiciary:” @ShyamMeeraSingh. 9/11
20 petitioners challenged Jan 2019 amendment of #Constitution by #Modi govt to allow education & job reservations on economic criteria alone. In Aug 2020, 3-judge bench referred case to 5-judge bench, never constituted in Ramana’s tenure. 10/11
>200 petitions challenged Citizenship Amendment Act as discriminatory to #Muslims & unconstitutional. SC bench held 2 hearings in Dec 2019/Jan 2020, refused a stay. No hearing since or in Justice Ramana’s tenure: 987 days have passed. 11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In April 2022, a petitioner in J&K #Article370 abrogation case requested Chief Justice N V Ramana’s bench for a hearing.
His answer: “We’ll see”.
He said he would reconstitute 5-judge bench & hear case “after the vacation”, which ended on 10 July. There was no hearing
2/6
“The judges must show some willingness to hear this case or they must give an explanation as to why they can’t hear the case on priority despite (sic) 3 years,” Mir told @OfficialSauravD
3/6
When cases have no legal basis, police make new allegations, based on unknown/untraceable complainants, file new cases with little/no evidence.@ManiChander11 identifies techniques union & state govts use to keep India’s ‘inconvenient citizens’ in jail. 1/7 article-14.com/post/jailed-or…
Activist Javed Mohd made calls for peace on 10 June, arrested as ‘mastermind’ of ‘conspiracy’ leading to violent protests in Prayagraj, UP, on 11 June. Within 24 hrs on a Sunday, 20+ yr old home where he lived (but didn’t own) was demolished as ‘illegal’.
2/7
Mohd #Zubair charged with ‘conspiracy’ but police can’t identify co-conspirator; fabricating evidence by deleting tweets but none deleted; accepting foreign donations, but no such donation made. Charges keep changing & an FIR allegedly registered against cash reward.
3/7
As police search for "evidence" on @zoo_bear's computer, @ManiChander11 wrote how police & investigative agencies currently claim unfettered access to your WhatsApp, private emails or chats. In the absence of clear laws, they do what they wish article-14.com/post/laws-arou…
What record-keeping requirements apply to the electronic search, and when must seized digital equipment be returned? What are the timelines to be followed by law enforcement during electronic search? Is the timing governed by the same rules as physical searches?
Where warrants are issued, what should be searched: the location of the electronic device, the device itself or the location where the electronic search will occur?
In a notice pasted at the gates, the management said the estate was being shut “due to complete lawlessness” & “delay reporting (sic)”. No workers would be entitled to any benefits, such as food rations & wages, said the notice in English, which most workers cannot read 2/7
“... plucking round could not be maintained and the management of Daloo Tea estate has suffered an irreparable loss in terms of quantity and quality of tea produced,” read the notice. An MoU was signed in March between 3 unions & estate owners.
3/7
In 2 books, Manoj Mitta revealed how investigators ignored evidence of State complicity in 1984 anti-#Sikh riots & 2002 #GujaratRiots.
As #SupremeCourt lauds SIT that exonerated Modi, Mitta’s 2014 book puts forth the questions it did not ask 1/6 article-14.com/post/-question…
Modi was allowed to distance himself from police failure to prevent 2002 #GujaratRiots, despite SIT evidence of police presence at siege of #GulbergSociety and related wireless communications 2/6
SIT acknowledged #GulbergSociety was set ablaze & many killed there by 3.45 pm. It recorded that #Modi had, meanwhile, held meetings with his officials tracking the violence as it unfolded and issuing instructions
3/6
Manoj Mitta revealed how investigators ignored evidence of State complicity in 1984 anti-#Sikh riots & 2002 #GujaratRiots. As #SupremeCourt lauds SIT that exonerated Modi, Mitta’s 2014 book reveals what it didn’t do. 1/6
Modi was allowed to distance himself from police failure to prevent 2002 #GujaratRiots, despite SIT evidence of police presence at siege of #GulbergSociety and related wireless communications. 2/6
SIT acknowledged #GulbergSociety was set ablaze & many killed there by 3.45 pm. It recorded that #Modi had, meanwhile, held meetings with his officials tracking the violence as it unfolded and issuing instructions. 3/6