The @CIJ_ICJ Advisory Opinion on the question of self-determination of #Palestinians, a thread to (briefly) explain the why and how.
What is an @CIJ_ICJ advisory opinion? opinions rendered by the Court contribute to the clarification and development of international law and thereby to the strengthening of peaceful relations between States.
Who can ask for an adviory opinion? In accordance with Article 96, paragraph 1, of the Charter of the United Nations “[t]he General Assembly or the Security Council may request the International Court of Justice to give an advisory opinion on any legal question”.
In what instances was the Court asked to give an opinion? @SCProcedure compiled the following list.
What is the issue not resolved by the @CIJ_ICJ 2004 opinion (construction of the wall)? The Court held #Plaestinian self-determination and Palestinian State is to be achieved as soon as possible, on the basis of international law, and a negotiated solution.
Asked today, the Court is likely to consider enquiry, mediation, conciliation, arbitration, and judicial settlement - all provided for under the @UN Charter - as the appropriate modalities towards the same end goal of #Palestinian emancipation, rather than bilateral negotiations
Has international law changed since 2004? When the Court considers peremptory norms of international law violated in the case of #Palestine, it will consider the work of the UN International Law Commission of recent years.
Peremptory norms of international law are norms accepted and recognized by the international community of States as a whole as norms from which no derogation is permitted.
Relevant to the case of #Palestine, the Court may find that the prohibition of aggression (including annexation), the basic rules of international humanitarian law, and the right of self-determination have been violated by #Israel.
That would necessarily mean that the right of self-determination of #Palestinians and their political enfranchisement could not be derogated from or made conditional on the resumption or outcome of negotiations with an alien ruler, #Israel.
What are the legal consequences that arise for all States and the United Nations from this? Peremptory norms of international law (such as the right to self-determination) give rise to obligations owed to the international community as a whole (obligations erga omnes).
Any State is entitled to invoke the responsibility of another State for a breach of a peremptory norm, in accordance with the rules on the responsibility of States for internationally wrongful acts.
What are the rules of State responsibility the @CIJ_ICJ will consider? a serious breach by a State of an obligation arising under a peremptory norm requires all States to cooperate to bring to an end through lawful means any serious breach.
No State shall recognize as lawful a situation created by a serious breach, nor render aid or assistance in maintaining that situation.
What could this mean for #Palestinians? a revitalized role - defined by the Court - of the international community in securing their rights to self-determination and ending #Israeli aggression, annexation, and violations of IHL.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@Palestine_UN tables a #UNGA77 resolution calling for an @CIJ_ICJ advisory opinion on the legal consequences arising from #Israel’s ongoing violation of the right of #Palestinian self-determination, its prolonged occupation, and annexation of Palestinian territory. Text follows:
Decides, in accordance with Article 96 of the Charter of the United Nations, to request the @CIJ_ICJ pursuant to Article 65 of the Statute of the Court, to urgently render an advisory opinion, on the following questions, considering the rules and principles of international law,
including the Charter of the @UN, international humanitarian law, international human rights law, relevant Security Council, General Assembly and @UN_HRC resolutions, and the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice of 9 July 2004:
On Monday, the @UN Security Council will address the implementation of #SCR2334, with @UNSCO_MEPP presenting the biannual implementation report. In the lead-up to the debate, @NRC_Norway briefed most Council Members; here is what I had stressed:
The resolution demanded that #Israel immediately and completely cease all
settlement activities in occupied #Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem,
and that it fully respects all of its legal obligations, including under the Fourth Geneva Convention #IHL.
In blatant disregard of the authoritative guidance of the #UNSC and peremptory norms of international law, consecutive #Israeli governments established 279 settlements, transferring 800K of its nationals to the territory of #Palestine; 1 out of 10 Israelis is now a settler.
According to @SCRtweets, later this evening the Security Council is expected to vote on a draft resolution calling for an “emergency special session” (ESS) of the @UN General Assembly to consider and recommend collective action on the situation in #Ukraine.
The draft resolution, tabled by @AlMissionUN and @USUN, is a #unitingforpeace resolution, referring a situation in which its permanent members are deadlocked to the General Assembly. If adopted, it would be the first such resolution the Council has adopted in four decades.
While the General Assembly could choose to discuss and vote on the current #RussiaUkraine conflict independently, the goal of several Council members is to send a strong political signal by pursuing a Security Council. “Uniting for Peace” resolution.
What does #Russia in relation to #Ukraine have in common - from the perspective of (mis)application of international law - with #Israel in relation to #Palestine? The answer is the obscure 'Missing Reversioner Doctrine.' A thread:
In 1968, with the nascent #Israeli occupation of #Palestinian territory, Prof. Yehuda Blum penned the ‘The Missing Reversioner: Reflections on the Status of Judea and Samaria’. Blum argued that there were no reversionary rights of an ousted legitimate government to the territory
In other words, he concluded that ‘those rules of belligerent occupation directed to safeguarding that sovereign’s reversionary rights had no application to #Israel’s control of the #WestBank and #Gaza. Hence, Israeli possession comes from an absolute title, not an occupation.
In #UkraineInvasion the jus ad bellum - resorting to armed force, and jus in bello - rules regulating the conduct of hostilities, intersect. Recognizing and understanding intersectionality is key to a well reasoned and effective response - normative, humanitarian, and political.
The prohibition against the use of force amongst states and the exceptions to it (self-defence, and UN authorization for the use of force), set out in the UN Charter, are the core ingredients of jus contra bellum.
Article 2(4) provides that "all Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations."
Was asked a simple and direct question today: What does #Israel intend for occupied #Palestnian territory, if it had its way? While answering may not be all that simple, we can - and should - infer from what Israel says, even if it is in a top-secret classified cable. So here:
On 20 July 1967, the #Israeli Interminsteral Committee on Occupied Territory - chaired by Major-General Chaim Herzog (later President of Israel and father of current President @Isaac_Herzog) wrote to the Prime Minister with 10 recommendations.
1. No bilateral negotiations, or resolution, with the Arabs of the #WestBank and #Gaza. 4. Cultivate sympathetic Arab leadership to espouse Israeli policy in the Arab world. 5. Quitely and diligently deport #Palestinains from occupied territory.