2/ To understand the intricacies of @fraxfinance’s monetary policy, we must first understand the basics of $FRAX as a stablecoin.
3/ $FRAX is a fractional algorithmic stablecoin pegged to USD. It is minted/redeemed through a combination of $USDC and $FXS, @fraxfinance’s governance token.
4/ This means $FRAX is mostly backed by other stablecoin collateral and partially algorithmic. The split between $USDC & $FXS is determined by the protocol’s collateral ratio (CR).
5/ At a 90% CR for example,
Users must deposit $0.9 USDC + $0.1 worth of $FXS to mint 1 $FRAX
Conversely, users receive $0.9 USDC + $0.1 worth of $FXS if they redeem 1 $FRAX
6/ The protocol adjusts the CR based on $FRAX price movement to maintain the peg
If $FRAX > 1, CR is lowered to incentivize minting (Less $USDC per $FRAX)
If $FRAX < 1, CR is increased to incentivize redeeming (More $USDC per $FRAX)
7/ This is known as @fraxfinance’s base stability mechanism. Most stablecoin protocols apply a similar economic lever to control their peg.
They disabled $FRAX’s mint / redeem functions (unless certain conditions are met).
8/ This was a deliberate move to pave the way for Algorithmic Market Operations Controllers (AMOs). Instead of relying on market forces to peg $FRAX, @fraxfinance has found a way to do so algorithmically.
10/ Each AMO has 4 features derived from the base stability mechanism
Decollateralize: - CR, + $FRAX supply
Market Operations: Maintain CR & accrue profit
Recollateralize: + CR, - $FRAX supply
FXS1559: Accounting ledger of profits for redistribution to veFXS holders
11/ Think of AMOs as smart contract modules that adjust $FRAX supply based on demand for $FRAX, which is represented by the price of $FRAX. Any deviation from $1 triggers a set of changes to restore the peg.
12/ Some AMOs also accrue profits for @fraxfinance through their operations, commonly known as seigniorage in #TradFi.
Investor: Yield farm with $USDC in whitelisted protocols
Lending: Mint $FRAX into money markets for over collateralized borrowing
Liquidity: Deploy $FRAX & $USDC into DEXes to earn fees
Curve: Deploy $FRAX & $USDC into @curvefinance pools
14/ ~70% of $USDC collateral is deployed in @CurveFinance, where $FRAX’s peg is maintained on the open market.
@fraxfinance’s dominance on @ConvexFinance has allowed them to incubate the $FRAX <> $3crv metapool and $FRAX <> $USDC base pool via $CRV emissions
15/ Whereas the @CurveFinance AMO accumulates protocol owned liquidity (POL) to achieve four key objectives:
(i) Tighten $FRAX peg to absorb larger sell pressure
(ii) De/Recollateralize by minting/burning $FRAX & depositing/withdrawing $USDC into pools based on $FRAX price
16/
(iii) Increase $CRV / $CVX dominance by depositing LP tokens into @ConvexFinance to farm more of both tokens; and
(iv) Redistribute fees & LP rewards to $veFXS holders
17/ To date, @fraxfinance owns approx. 85% of the metapool and 31% of the base pool. The Curve (and Liquidity) AMO(s) have allowed Frax to accumulate a large amount of stable-LPs as collateral, most of which also includes $FRAX.
18/ Out of its 1B market supply, only 390M is outstanding $FRAX at its current CR of 93.75%. The rest of the $FRAX is owned by @fraxfinance as POL.
Think of the outstanding amount as $FRAX that requires collateral backing in case of a bank run.
19/ @fraxfinance holds $399M in protocol collateral, meaning for every outstanding $FRAX, there is $1.023 worth of assets or secondary market liquidity backing the stablecoin.
20/ TLDR; @fraxfinance has successfully implemented AMOs for
✅Algorithmic monetary policy
✅Peg stability & tightening
✅Seigniorage
✅Flywheel maximization
All the while remaining solvent.
21/ This isn’t financial engineering. It’s art. @fraxfinance
22/ If you like my work, pls like and RT the first tweet linked below:
1/ The world's largest crypto lender is collapsing.
Genesis, under DCG, is ironically the latest victim of the FTX contagion after publishing Alameda Research's balance sheet via Coindesk (DCG's subsidiary).
The contagion has come full circle. Here's what you need to know ⬇️