Adv Ojha points out First false statement by Plaintiff that it is not proved that death of Dr. Snehal Lunawat was due to side effects of vaccines and therefore the allegations by defendants are false and the defendants are guilty of defaming plaintiff.
Plaintiff also failed to file petition copy of Dr. Snehal Lunawat against SII.
Adv Ojha points out Smt. Kiran Yadav also filed a criminal writ petition before this Hon’ble Court bearing Writ Petition (Cri.) No. 6159 of 2021 for direction to CBI to initiate criminal prosecution against Poonawala and their partner in crime #BillGates & others. @adarpoonawalla
Yadav’s 23 year old son died after taking #Covishield
“it is clear that the accused are habitual offenders of earning profits by selling vaccines with death causing side effects and therefore,
they are in the category of ‘Mass Murderers’. The minimum punishment for such offences is death penalty.”
Adv Ojha informs the court that more than 1000 similar cases will be filed in nearby areas in the next one month. There will be many more around the country.
#AstraZeneca is banned in 21 countries. One young person died in ‘Norway Country’ and that was enough to restrict it. Now the Plaintiff says #AstraZeneca is not the same as #Covishield . This is a lie as submitted by Government of India itself. @PMOIndia@DrAseemMalhotra
In August 2021, Cyrus Poonawala says “All the people should get #Booster dose also”. This shows that all the doses that were discarded in Europe will be given to Indian citizens.
Ojha infers that this shows they have no concern for Indian lives and only want to earn money.
Adv. Ojha recalls hearing for #Vaccinemandate in front of CJ Dutta in Bombay HC. After providing the data, he asked Govt of MH to provide all notes, minutes etc to show basis for the decision. When no documents were presented CJ Dutta said “You have fooled the courts as well”.
Dr. K K Aggarwal took 2 doses of #Covishield & then died of #Corona . 67 such doctors died similarly. “You can’t fool all the people all the time” #Lincoln
1. As per Supreme court of India, no can can be forced for #vaccination , it is a violation of Right to Life, Article 21.
2. As per Delhi high court judgement Informed consent of parent is a must. #InformedConsent means parents have to be told about the de@th causing side effects of this MR vaccine. (All the deaths and severe side effects media reported since 1989 are given)
Two imp cases against #BillGates & Adar Poonawalla before Bombay High Court listed .
(i) Before Justice Riyaz Chagla*
(Court Room No. 21)( Fixed Matter at 2.30. p.m.)*
(a) I.A. No. 39735 of 2022 In Civil Suit (L) No. 33253 of 2023*
(Ambar Koiri Vs. Serum Institute and anr)
Under *section 340 of Cr.P.C.* for prosecution of Adar Poonawalla & others in perjury, issuing arrest warrant against Poonawalla &attachment of their property.
(b) I.A.(St.) No. 1146 of 2023.
Under *0.7 R-11 & Section 151 of Cr. P.C.* for dismissal of Suit filed by Serum Inst
*(ii) Before Division Bench of Justice A.S. Gadkari & Justice P.D. Naik*
On the compensation being sought, the affidavit said that the petitioners have other legal remedies including approaching a civil court for damages.
It was also emphasised that a strict liability on Union or State governments for administering the vaccine is not legally tenable, since the vaccines are manufactured by third-parties.
"The Central Government asks citizens to file compensation cases against Serum Institute, responsible guilty officers of the state governments and not to seek from the Central government. #INeverSaidThis
Really? @PMOIndia @narendramodi_in
#NeverSaidThis.
But this is what you said just b4 the launch of the v@x campaign regarding v@x side effects. No mention/warning whatsoever of any of the serious side effects.
Our account @awakenindiamvmt was suspended for tweeting regarding potential C0vid V@ccine adverse events and violating supposed #twitter policy on spreading misleading and potentially harmful information related to COVID-19.
The data we had presented is officially accepted by many peer reviewed research papers as well Government Sources like VAERS.
If reporting about peer reviewed and documented evidence of potential adverse events of Covid v@ccine is misleading then
it would be considered the highest attack on free speech and the ability to inform and educate the public. It is the right of every individual to be informed about both the risks and benefits of any medical intervention.