Congrats to the team out of #southkorea for completing a huge #COVID19 💉 #myocarditis study on their entire population to better characterize immunization myocarditis for all of us. Let's talk about what the paper really showed, instead of what the pundits think it showed.
I know how much work it is to coordinate all the moving parts and all the healthcare professionals to put together something like this, so if you ever meet this team, they deserve a digital round of applause.
The primary objective was to look at the medium term and long term outcomes of COVID vaccine myocarditis, count the amount, stratify by age, and find out what the most severe outcomes were. There were several levels of results, some of which confirm other studies, others are new:
1. The overall rate of myocarditis in 44.2 million people was 1/ 100 000, in everybody added together, including down to 12 years of age.
2. The males had it more than the females. 3. The mRNA vaccines (moderna > pfizer) caused myocarditis the most (with the addition of prior works, we can interpret this as certain people having cytokinopathies, predisposing them to myocarditis).
4. The severe myocarditis formed 19.8% of total myocarditis casese (this is the highest amount of severe myocarditis ever reported), but this formed 0.22/ 100 000 overall.
5. Dose 1+2 created more myo than the 3rd dose. 6. Total rate of myocarditis in the most at risk age group, 12-39, = 1/52540 (calculated by dividing amount of myocarditis diagnosed divided by total population in the age group) (this is on the smaller end compared to others)
7. Sudden cardiac arrest patients were found to have myocarditis by autopsy. 8. 0 kids died. 9. The hand-waving on twitter about people dying in droves from 💉 myocarditis, did not pan out.
When expanded to a population the size of the United States, this study proves that the risks from COVID disease exceed the risk from COVID vaccine myocarditis in the deaths, even in the teens, and especially in the morbidity.
What is peculiar about this study? 1. So far it is uncertain why they are reporting the highest rates of severe myocarditis in the world. Maybe there are genetic differences in susceptibility (this certainly pans out in dilated cardiomyopathy, a different heart condition).
2. One of their severe myocarditis that went on to heart transplant turned out to be giant cell myocarditis, which is a different immunologic condition from vaccine myocarditis (the cells respond differently).
3. They reported vaccine myocarditis diagnoses even out to 42 days after initial vaccination, which suggests to me that some of the myocarditis may be autoimmune from another mechanism (this diagnosis is more dangerous than vaccine myocarditis which may account for the severity).
4. Now that so many people have had COVID even multiple times, and we do not have a good test to tell between viral myocarditis and COVID vaccine myocarditis, some of the myocarditis could have been COVID viral myocarditis (I hope the viral panel they used excluded COVID).
Recall that @VirusesImmunity has demonstrated that autoimmune myocarditis carries a different cell signature than vaccine myocarditis.
Take home points: 1. #Myocarditis could be a serious condition but the overall amount of vaccine myocarditis that goes on to serious myocarditis is a really tiny number. I'm not sure the reason why this study is reporting the highest number yet seen.
Like anyone else, I hate to see people dying from COVID vaccine myocarditis. 2. When medical attention is given, myocarditis can be diagnosed early and treated. 3. All the bad things that can happen from #COVID disease, are worse than the equivalent from COVID vaccine.
4. This is a role model study on how to figure out the epidemiology of #myocarditis at a country level. #Cardiologist adjudication using Brighton collaboration criteria and #CDC case definition criteria are key, not just logging on to OpenVAERS.
3.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@drcole12 is making mistakes here that even a #pathology trainee would be embarrassed to make. His core claim is that spike protein from vaccines is inducing blood clotting. This is generally false.
The source of his data is @ArneBurkhardt , who first off, makes so many logical errors that it deserves a thread of its own.
Next, Cole presents slides from Burkhardt's presentation free of context, to give the reader a veneer of legitimacy, but in reality, all deceased people have blood clots. The basis of his claim is essentially the slide shown above, with an absence of awareness of basic dying.
#Enterovirus#Myocarditis is getting a lot of attention in the media right now so, I'm here to share a general overview of what this is.
According to our professional organization, @ACCinTouch , the definition of myocarditis is any condition that causes inflammation of the heart. There are a big list of causes, and the most common ones in adults are different from the most common ones in kids.
Enterovirus is a specific category of virus, and it is one of the infections (overall most common cause in all ages) which is capable of causing heart inflammation.
The most basic way - he blocked almost all of #Medtwitter for disagreeing with him, and simultaneously claims that everyone needs to at least listen to people who disagree.
Whatever happened to actions speak louder than words @VPrasadMDMPH?
I was dedicatedly enough to vaccine myocarditis that I both personally participated in caring for patients with this condition by the usual @ACCinTouch standards and participated in the clinical research on this topic.
That’s about as close as you can get to asking the hard questions.
The expectation for a physician or clinical researcher is to always ask questions accompanied by standardized scientific reasoning, along with attempts to understand, or demonstrated proficiency in the current research. Asking questions accompanied by deflection,
#Pathology#COVID19#spike#autopsy The German pathologist @ArneBurkhardt is getting a lot of stuff wrong with his presentations to the EU parliament and other interested parties on his supposed technique to determine vaccine related adverse events after autopsy.
First off, its not cool to represent yourself as a member of a pathology group in Reutlingen when you are no longer officially employed there. A qualifier like "former" would be better. The people who actually work there: pathologie-reutlingen.de
#Antivax#vaccineswork#primarycare If you have read the book Turtles all the way down, by an anonymous author, and edited by @ChildrensHD attorney Mary Holland, you have been deliberately, and systematically lied to. A small sampling of the antivax strategies used:
1. Claim that nobody knows how to read scientific studies except for them. If you intentionally misinterpret studies on traditional vaccines, you can literally come up with any conclusion you want.
2. Using deliberately hostile language in reference to the men and women who spent their professional careers working on immunizations. Much of what @ChildrensHD does is to create imaginary hostility to spread their message.