Profile picture
Rob Ford @robfordmancs
, 24 tweets, 7 min read Read on Twitter
This was a bit too lazy and glib on my part. This subject deserves more careful, clear explanation on what's wrong and why here. So that's what I'm going to do here 1/?
Lets' start with the headline "George Soros, the man who 'broke the Bank of England' backs secret plot to thwart Brexit". This is worth unpacking. The substance of the article, and Nick Timothy's comment piece, is an organisation "Best for Britain" that Soros has helped finance
The organisation is public. The goals of the organisation - to secure and win a second referendum - are public. Timothy's article quotes previous public statements by Lord Malloch-Brown (another backer). They're headed by Gina Miller, who is not exactly averse to publicity.
So the organisation is not a secret plot. It is true that Soros backs them. But he isn't the fonder (Miller) the chairman (Mark Malloch-Brown) or the CEO (Eloise Todd). So why the focus on him? And why "secret plot" for a public organisation, pursuing publicly stated goals?
Well, what happens if you search "George Soros conspiracy" on google? Images like these, pages and pages of them
"Oh, that's just cranks. Internet is full of cranks. Proves nothing", you may say. OK. Except it isn't. Here's Hungarian PM Viktor Orban framing the EU refugee policy as a "Soros conspiracy": ft.com/content/76ce19…
Here's Orban's frontal assault on the Soros founded European University Institute in Budapest, a fiercely independent world leading research institution: thetimes.co.uk/article/hardli…
There are billboards everywhere in Hungary with Soros' face next to text about "conspiracy." Just like the @Telegraph front page splash
Nor is it just Hungary. Poland's ruling party and state media regularly propagate stories about Soros conspiracies. @BDStanley can provide plenty of examples washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-ca…
So does Vladimir Putin and Russian state media. So does the Trumpist right in the US. So does the far right in practically every European country. "Shadowy Soros lead conspiracy" is one of the leading right wing memes in the world.
"Maybe the Telegraph didn't know about any of that? Maybe its an innocent coincidence?" OK, in that case, how to explain the boxout section on the article, which I attach here.
Claim 1: OSF banned from Russia and Uzbekistan. Not mentioned: what it was banned for. Promoting democracy and attacking practices like slavery and torture hrw.org/news/2015/12/0…
opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/despite…
Claim 2: "Accused by Hungarian PM Viktor Orban of trying to orchestrate an ultra-liberal crusade..."
An accusation made by an autocratic PM stoking a campaign against a university Soros funds which criticises his govt (Soros has funded the education of thousands of E Europeans)
Claim 3: "Accused of toppling governments in Geogia and Ukraine"
Accused by who? Not mentioned: these were undemocratic, Russian backed governments, and the main accusers are Russia and (again) the far right. Again no attempt at balance here.
So, to sum up, we have a headline which puts front and centre (with a massive picture too) a figure who is Enemy #1 in anti-semitic far right and E European natioanlist conspiracy theories. The framing "secret plot" is the framing they use.
The boxout giving readers info on Soros repeats three of the commonest anti-Soros campaigns by autocratic, far right nationalists, without attribution or evidence (using the weaselly passive voice "he is accused...")
Now, is this anti-semitism or not? I leave that to the reader to decide. But to anyone who has spent time in Hungary, Poland, Russia, or studies the US or European far right, this all looks mighty familiar.
Occam's razor: is it really plausible to believe the authors of this article could do sufficient research to provide all the material on Soros controversies in the boxout, without at any stage discovering how these anti-Soros campaigns are used, and by who?
Did they manage to google search "Soros Orban" and somehow miss stories like this?
bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
And this?
rt.com/news/411693-or…
And this?
ft.com/content/e38883…
Those are three of the first articles which appear on the front page of google when one googles "Soros Orban".
Are we really to believe that Nick Timothy, a top aide to aPM, was unaware how Soros is portrayed and used by nationalists in European govts and in European far right parties? Or that, despite being aware, he couldn't prevent the Telegraph from framing things this way?
Even if we buy all of this, do Brexiteers really think moving the Brexit debate to the terrain of far right nationalists is a good idea? Or, as @hugorifkind put it:
Journalists make choices. They choose how to frame the argument. They chose "Soros" "secret plot", big picture of Soros, and unattributed, uncritiqued anti-Soros campaigns by authoritarian governments. Those are the choices they need to explain, defend, or retract.
If this is the hill they choose to plant their flag on, and they stick to that choice, we can all form our own judgements about that. Sorry for the long thread all. This is important so I wanted to get it down in detail. /ends/
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Rob Ford
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!