It. Is. On.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/815db/815dbc2d754d233ff0be979de5c1e613aca719ff" alt=""
Start with the basics. Separation of powers:
Executive (government)
Legislative (Parliament)
Judiciary (courts)
All constitutionally separate. With me so far?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77863/778632f7e6a7590b78ccd9bf9089872e461a7abc" alt=""
Stop me if I’m going too quickly for you. I can add illustrations if that helps.
From doctors. Not anyone in government.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fa7e/7fa7ef4dd6add2c7307510ea5003d6483256a85c" alt=""
Please do jump in at any time to explain how, in your medico-legal expertise, the judge and/or experienced doctors have got this wrong.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/67db6/67db60124f7c1723afb10e99919c95534a09b771" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/031e3/031e3abb94c4eb6ac78506fc85643c1bc8e0c833" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56be0/56be0f21d5eea1c4f2ae53149a9cfd2f32a5c4b4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3342/f3342d8669090a4da176ead047a63cdcc3a71857" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10f88/10f881b8760254bc6aad7759a4eb62b75dc6903d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbeaa/cbeaaf564b121d3941cd3e8873183ef8c953c173" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/955d8/955d836da021d0ffdf609665b0d467fc91c2a78f" alt=""
The “advice” was entirely bogus.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca8c8/ca8c8475b6fd63b3d844c045605eac7496841111" alt=""
The court described this as “startling”. That’s judge-speak for “batshit”.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7412d/7412d95a3c0d1a1bc9935b2ed12afe0157d5f496" alt=""
I mean it, @Liz_Wheeler. Jump in at any point if I’m getting any of this wrong. You, after all, started this by correcting me on how English law works.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4814e/4814ef3dc1b55dfc1b16505ec67b4798a018fb6a" alt=""
Not on “cost of treatment”. Nothing to do with “socialised medicine” or “death panels”.
Solely what is medically best for a very sick child.
If not, your opinion is worthless and you are monstrously self-publicising over a family’s most unimaginable tragedy.
- Government was not involved at all in the decision.
- Decision based solely on assessment of Alfie’s best interests
- Medical evidence overwhelming
- Christian fundamentalists lying about the law to exploit tragedy.
- Twitter idiots fuelling fire.
Have a nice day.
SB