Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #christoislamic
Most recents (20)
Can anyone explain why a "secular" state funds Muslim clerics?
There is no secularism like this anywhere else in the world. Hindus have been made a fool of in India.
There is no secularism like this anywhere else in the world. Hindus have been made a fool of in India.
The answer is simple. India is a religious apartheid state.
Indian “secularism” exists to serve #ChristoIslamic propagation.
sankrant.org/2017/12/consti…
Indian “secularism” exists to serve #ChristoIslamic propagation.
sankrant.org/2017/12/consti…
The salary is paid by "Waqf Boards" which are funded and supported by the State.
Very cleverly, any "shortfall" is borne by the central and state government. And since you don't want to "penalize" those Waqf Boards which are efficient, provide State grants to *all* boards.
Very cleverly, any "shortfall" is borne by the central and state government. And since you don't want to "penalize" those Waqf Boards which are efficient, provide State grants to *all* boards.
I don't see a problem with students practising English-speaking skills. Try Chinese too.
The problem is in *denying* opportunities to those without English-speaking/writing skills. Government must end #EnglishApartheid in higher education and judiciary and level playing field.
The problem is in *denying* opportunities to those without English-speaking/writing skills. Government must end #EnglishApartheid in higher education and judiciary and level playing field.
The so-called "Dravidian" hate movement against #HindiImposition was never about Tamil. EVR called Tamil a barbarian language.
It was always about establishing English supremacy. Just like Hindu/Brahmin-hate ia a cover for #ChristoIslamic conversion.
It was always about establishing English supremacy. Just like Hindu/Brahmin-hate ia a cover for #ChristoIslamic conversion.
Lol. "English-medium" is not needed for corporate jobs in China or Japan or Korea or Germany or France. Even for MNCs. Why is it *needed* in India?
If India were a secular state, ex-Muslims would be safe, anyone could criticize any “prophet” and Hindu temples wouldn’t be taxed and schemes funded for non-Hindus.
But it isn’t secular. India is a de facto sharia state.
But it isn’t secular. India is a de facto sharia state.
Naturally. The Islamic Sharia State of India is obligated to aid in the demographic war of true believers.
This is why the age of marriage for kaffirs is raised to the highest in the world.
This is why the age of marriage for kaffirs is raised to the highest in the world.
Lol, blasphemy itself is a #ChristoIslamic concept.
It has no relevance in a secular state nor in an Indic one.
It has no relevance in a secular state nor in an Indic one.
How the #ChristoIslamic state of India, following its legacy in colonialism, continues to attack and destroy indigenous traditions.
@ysjagan has turned it into shameless robbery for the Christian evangelizing mission. As Christians did the world over.
@ysjagan has turned it into shameless robbery for the Christian evangelizing mission. As Christians did the world over.
This was part of Pat Robertson's AD2000 plan, started in the 1990s. It was to shift from foreign missionaries to local missionaries who are cheaper and more effective. They planned this. I started writing about this in 2002, no one paid attention.
The Joshua Project came out of AD 2000 project. They have a war plan to convert India. They've mapped every village, every community. Our response? "Ham sab ek hain" "Secular fabric kharab ho jayega". Such BS. There is a war and we close our eyes.
Problem with the @dhume's is this. They do not find attacks by Muslims on Hindus, continuing in today's India, morally repugnant at all. In fact, they don't even mention it since it doesn't fit their script. We documented hundreds of such attacks in the Hindu Human Rights Report.
This is the same thinking that made Indian "seculars" even spin away the brutal murder of Hindu women and children by a Muslim mob in Godhra. Even in a genocide of Hindus they'd be talking about Muslims as victims. Since only that serves the propaganda.
Lol, minorities? Didn't hear them speak up for Jains, or for ex-Muslims, a tiny minority. They speak only for the most powerful globally dominant religious groupings. They know where their $ bread is buttered.
The rapacious "zamindar" has been the archetype of the atrocities of the "caste system" on the poor "lower castes."
But the Zamindar is a Persian word, it status enshrined by the British along European feudal lords. Its not about Hindu "varna", but #ChristoIslamic imperialism.
But the Zamindar is a Persian word, it status enshrined by the British along European feudal lords. Its not about Hindu "varna", but #ChristoIslamic imperialism.
@mjakbar The British literally constructed Zamindari based on English feudalism. That "caste system" including notion of "blood purity" ("blue blood" of aristocracy) and casting of Indian society groups into a static hierarchy is all a British imperial production.
Cultivation of Hindu hate comes from the needs of colonialism and evangelism, which seeded the academic memes to study India in the last 150 years.
Colonialism fashioned a "Sikh identity" in opposition to "Hindu" to serve the needs of the British army.
Colonialism fashioned a "Sikh identity" in opposition to "Hindu" to serve the needs of the British army.
To control a Hindu civilizational state, different groups had to be split to regard the Hindu as the "other." "Sikh" creation was literally done via the army, which excluded non-keshadharis and even non-jats.
This is Macauliffe on the British Army fashioning the "Sikh religion."
This is Macauliffe on the British Army fashioning the "Sikh religion."
Similarly, for the conversion of Indian, the evangelicals had to set up different groups in opposition. People were rooted in their own traditions. To cut roots, hate was necessary.
So you say:
1. "Tribals" were never Hindu
2. Hindus oppressed you
3. "Hinduism" is for Brahmins
So you say:
1. "Tribals" were never Hindu
2. Hindus oppressed you
3. "Hinduism" is for Brahmins
France does not have any special rights for “religious minorities” in its constitution. US does not have special rights for “religious minorities.”
In India these “minorities” were former rulers. These special rights are a form of colonial apartheid.
sankrant.org/2017/12/consti…
In India these “minorities” were former rulers. These special rights are a form of colonial apartheid.
sankrant.org/2017/12/consti…
India is not secular, nor is it Indic. It is largely a #ChristoIslamic Sharia state where Hindus are second class citizens and the government has huge “minority” schemes to incentivize conversion out of Hinduism. Including new ones by @narendramodi govt.
Traditionally, many Hindu women trained in the martial arts. It is not accidental that so many princesses were able to lead battles.
Read about Rampyari Gujjar, who lead an army of 40,000 against Taimur. grpr.in/sw
Read about Rampyari Gujjar, who lead an army of 40,000 against Taimur. grpr.in/sw
"Patriarchy" originates from the Abrahamic male God, from Christianity and the "Pope" (literally patriarch). All these forces attack Hindu traditions based on the Divine Feminine where women are powerful and honored, not property as in #ChristoIslam.
The biggest hoax in India is that the two wealthiest most-powerful world dominant religions get special "minority rights" while none of the really small powerless communities do.
The special "minority" rights are to help these 2 powerful global forces to destroy the rest.
The special "minority" rights are to help these 2 powerful global forces to destroy the rest.
It is not a problem of the world as much as of India. No other country in the world has a created a “religious minority”-favoring #ReligiousApartheid state as India has.
Foolish Indians are led to believe that this is “normal” for the world.
Foolish Indians are led to believe that this is “normal” for the world.
India is a constitutional minorytism, a religious apartheid state, the only one of its kind in the world.
It has been designed precisely to advance #ChristoIslamic mission for dominance.
Hindus are gaslighted to believe this is “normal” for the world.
sankrant.org/2017/12/consti…
It has been designed precisely to advance #ChristoIslamic mission for dominance.
Hindus are gaslighted to believe this is “normal” for the world.
sankrant.org/2017/12/consti…
This is what 70 years of secularism has done in India—pushed #ChristoIslamic expansion and persecution of Hindus which dwarfs even what the British and Mughals had done.
North East was evangelized *after* independence. They resisted all invaders but the ones in “secular” India.
North East was evangelized *after* independence. They resisted all invaders but the ones in “secular” India.
This is why. “Secularism” protects the expansion of predatory religions but limits the options of those who resist them. The Police State acts to limit the freedom of native traditions to protect themselves. Indian minorityist “secularism” is even worse.
sankrant.org/2005/12/the-co…
sankrant.org/2005/12/the-co…
People vote for BJP in the Northeast hoping that it will protect native traditions. What does BJP do once elected? Fund predator religion to prove how “secular” they are.
@PemaKhanduBJP @KirenRijiju @AmitShah
@PemaKhanduBJP @KirenRijiju @AmitShah
Marxist historiography of India is replete with error because it is driven by ideology.
Facts are carefully chosen and discarded to fit the ideology; and if they still don’t fit the pre-conceived theory, they are “liberally” manufactured as well.
Needs to be trashed.
Facts are carefully chosen and discarded to fit the ideology; and if they still don’t fit the pre-conceived theory, they are “liberally” manufactured as well.
Needs to be trashed.
E.g. their need to whitewash Islamic iconoclasm. As Islamic 100%ers they must prove—1. Islamic invaders were not destructive, and driven by religious zealotry despite ample evidence from primary sources. When they fail at that they claim—2. Hindu kings were just as destructive.
They do immense contortions for this because iconoclasm, destruction of “idols”, subjugation of others’ temples and religion is a core part of Islamic theology. It is found across the world (e.g. in Turkey & ME)
Likewise, iconoclasm is simply not inherent in Hindu thought.
Likewise, iconoclasm is simply not inherent in Hindu thought.
Yes, this whole "breast tax" on "lower caste women" is a completely fake narrative. In many native communities across the world, women were topless just like men. In Kerala, the queen was topless in the 19th century as were Nair women. #FakeNarratives.
The whole "leering" comes from the #ChristoIslamic gaze and perversion of the mind. Exposing the breast was no more sexual than exposing women's face or the chest of men. The sexual-obsession-repression of #ChristoIslam creates rape and burqa culture.
It had nothing to do with wealth but with Anglicization and the colonial gaze. But we really need to document the old photos of proud grandmothers from Kerala to West Bengal and to document experiences.
Bigotry and intolerance is inherent to #ChristoIslamic monotheism. It comes from the doctrine of each having access to exclusive truth, unbelievers being bound for hell.
In India their followers bizarrely attack Hindus as “communal” and their bigotry passes off as “secular.” 🙄
In India their followers bizarrely attack Hindus as “communal” and their bigotry passes off as “secular.” 🙄
Of course many Indian Christians and Muslims who have internalized Indic pluralism and also participate in a multi-religious experience. #IshratJahan reading Hanuman Chalisa was a recent example.
But strangely, Indian “seculars” don’t support plural Christians & Muslims.
But strangely, Indian “seculars” don’t support plural Christians & Muslims.
Indian Seculars support an @khanumarfa and a Hamid Ansari over an Abdul Kalaam or an Arif Khan Mohammad.
Seculars push #ChristoIslamkc fundamentalism over Indic pluralism.
Seculars push #ChristoIslamkc fundamentalism over Indic pluralism.
If you are a dharmic, Hindu, Sikh or Buddhist, who is eating halal meat think of the karmic consequences—an animal killed with cruelty, bled to death.
Newsbreak: Almost all meat you're eating is halal today unless you're getting it butchered yourself.
#NoToHalal #CrueltyFreeMeat
Newsbreak: Almost all meat you're eating is halal today unless you're getting it butchered yourself.
#NoToHalal #CrueltyFreeMeat
Every time you eat at a restaurant, ask? Perhaps a "certified jhatka" movement can be started.
Many kshatriyas and others have traditionally eaten meat. There is no blanket prohibition in Vedic Hinduism.
#CongressisOver they say. But it has just taken rebirth. BJP is Congress 2.0.
Would Goa MLA's have joined BJP without Church's ok? Church is probably convinced its agenda can succeed faster with BJP's efficient execution.
livemint.com/politics/polic…
Would Goa MLA's have joined BJP without Church's ok? Church is probably convinced its agenda can succeed faster with BJP's efficient execution.
livemint.com/politics/polic…
I thought I was bashing the BJP. What's with your "minority" obsession? 😏 The richest corporation in the world and biggest pvt landowner in India is a "minority"? Shed tears for Walmart next since Flipkart is a "minority"? 😂 An amusing #ChristoIslamic troll, but dumb. Muting.
The Church and Coca Cola are similar. Both are mega corps. Both sell sugar water. Both are bad for you. Except Church's marketing is way better. You pay money for a product which is delivered after you die and no one's ever seen it. And you scare your customers for retention. 😏
This was done in Karnataka and Maharashtra as well. The entire plan from jallikattu to Sabarimala to "anti-superstition" is to ban popular Hindu folk practices. For common people, these are the link, not high advaita. Conversion war targets these, aided by "modern" Hindus.
Unfortunately large parts of "Hindutva" also looks down on these folk practices as "backward." Wants Hinduism to be "modern & scientific." Become allies in the conversion war.
ultra.news/s-e/47866/kera…
ultra.news/s-e/47866/kera…
Create an arbitrary test of "non-mainstream superstition" to exclude Islam and Christianity, since they can have no scientific definition of superstition. So acts are carefully targeted to exclude them since the entire point is #ChristoIslamic supremacy.
The battle is between Indic pluralism and totalitarian Abrahamism.
#Ramalingam was upholding Indic pluralism. Totalitarian Islamists murdered him.
Indian "seculars" are on the side of #ChristoIslamic totalitarianism in this war.
#Ramalingam was upholding Indic pluralism. Totalitarian Islamists murdered him.
Indian "seculars" are on the side of #ChristoIslamic totalitarianism in this war.
Indian "seculars" aim to turn India into Nigeria, a state of war between Christianity and Islamic after killing native traditions. Both totalitarian ideologies are monopolistic, in perpetual war with all others. This has nothing to do with "Hindutva."
telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/06/1…
telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/06/1…
The Conflict is not about "cattle." Local issues will always be found. It is about theology. Christianity and Islam both make exclusive non-negotiable truth claims, that their "God" has authorized and revealed. This is the source of all religious conflict in the world.
As I've said before, in India "secularism" is identical to #ChristoIslamism. Whatever supports the #ChristoIslamic conversion war will be called secular, who ever opposes it will be dubbed "communal" and targeted.
Indian seculars are sepoys of #ChristoIslam.
Indian seculars are sepoys of #ChristoIslam.
Secularism is a cure for the disease of totalitarian monotheistic Abrahamic religion. So it is useful in Christian and Islamic dominated societies. It is a step backwards for plural India and is used for the opposite effect—to propagate intolerant Abrahamisms.
Like how administering a drug to a healthy patient can cause sickness, pushing secularism in India replicates the pathology of Europe's religious conflicts to India. Secularism is a sickness for India
#ChristoIslamic building their church/mosque on top of destroying others’ is well-documented throughout the world. Denied in India just because native civilization survives.
With a little more power, destroying Ram Mandir to build the mosque would be displayed with Islamic pride.
With a little more power, destroying Ram Mandir to build the mosque would be displayed with Islamic pride.
On my visit to Turkey the Istanbul museum proudly displays Churches that were destroyed or converted to mosques. Hagia Sophia is a living example. With power the same Islamic denial in India would proudly claim how Ram Temple was destroyed. (Secular apologists would be halal)
Here is my guide in Peru showing me a Church built after destroying an Inca temple to “show the superiority of their god.”
