#ChristoIslamic building their church/mosque on top of destroying others’ is well-documented throughout the world. Denied in India just because native civilization survives.
With a little more power, destroying Ram Mandir to build the mosque would be displayed with Islamic pride.
With a little more power, destroying Ram Mandir to build the mosque would be displayed with Islamic pride.
On my visit to Turkey the Istanbul museum proudly displays Churches that were destroyed or converted to mosques. Hagia Sophia is a living example. With power the same Islamic denial in India would proudly claim how Ram Temple was destroyed. (Secular apologists would be halal) 
Here is my guide in Peru showing me a Church built after destroying an Inca temple to “show the superiority of their god.”
Iconoclasm of Christianity and Islam comes from their theology of a “jealous god”, of “making no graven images”, of “having no partners for Allah” and “idolatry being the worst sin.”
This is why it is systematic and large-scale and Muslim chroniclers proudly document destruction.
This is why it is systematic and large-scale and Muslim chroniclers proudly document destruction.
Left apologists for Islam try to spin this away by saying “Hindus also destroyed temples” or “Hindus destroyed Buddhist shrines” but it is a false equivalence. Firstly, the evidence is spotty, secondly it is not driven by iconoclastic theology. This makes it rare and sporadic.
For instance in the Burmese invasion of Thailand, if you go the city of Ayuthya, which I visited, there are a number of Buddha statutes that we’re destroyed. Even the conquerors were Buddhist. That may happen in a war, but unlike #ChristoIslam is not driven by theology, so rare.
