Profile picture
Kaitlyn Werner @kaitlynmwerner
, 6 tweets, 2 min read Read on Twitter
What is the future of well-being research? Looking forward to this exciting symposium organized by Maike Luhmann #ecp2018
Felix Cheung: assessing changes is life satisfaction and hope during the Syrian war

LS: 1.1 SD drop
Hope: 0.5 SD drop
PA: 0.6 SD drop
NA: 1.0 SD increase
Syria has the worst well-being ever reported in the Gallup poll. When compared to other war-torn countries, Syria fares substantially worse.
Side note from Sonja Lyubomirsky: the happiness pie was more of a thought experiment from 18 years ago. Based on a very limited body of work and they’re open to re-interpretations!
Maike Luhmann arguing against a typological approach to life events in favour of a more dimensional approach
The 9 dimensions (sorry for the grainy picture...the text was really small)
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Kaitlyn Werner
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Related hashtags

#ecp2018

More from @kaitlynmwerner see all

Profile picture
Can someone honestly point me to an example of a newly hired faculty at an R1 who truly only worked 40hrs/week before being hired? I'm betting the answer is no. So until the people in positions of power change the norms (e.g., for hiring), statements like this mean nothing, imo.
Could you be successful in 40hrs only? Sure, I don't doubt that. But will it get you the job you want? I highly doubt it. I've seen a lot of emphasis on encouraging grad students and ECRs to incorporate more work-life balance, but it shouldn't be up to us.
Instead, the focus should be on the expectations pushed on us. You can't expect someone to publish frequently in top journals, frequently travel to conferences, engage in academic service, etc. & have a normal life. We're not bad at balancing per se, you just expect too much.
Read 3 tweets
Profile picture
So, a few months ago I submitted my first paper with open data. A couple of weeks ago, the paper got rejected because of the data I shared. Let me tell you, this experience has been quite a rollercoaster ride. Thread 1/n
When preparing the data, I scrutinized the hell out of the files. I wanted to make sure the variable names made sense to anyone who stumbled across the data, I quadruple checked all of the analyses. I posted the r script. Surely, there was nothing that I missed, right? 2/n
Turns out, NO. I get the unexpected editors decision that my paper was flat out rejected. I was quite confused because this paper is actually pretty important, and I thought for sure this journal would find it interesting. I was upset, so I put it aside for a day. 3/n
Read 15 tweets
Profile picture
So, basically, it's Zimbardo's words against the participants' and, despite there being evidence against Z's recounts, he is SO SURE that he is right. Because, you know, it's not like he has anything riding on this experiment or whatever 🙄 This guy is ridiculous and a total sham
In fact, Z goes on to say the Ps weren't acting (despite one explicitly saying he did) because what would they get from that? I wish the reporter would have asked him the same question: well, you have a lot of motive here, so what could YOU possibly get (or lose) from all this?
Reporter: Do you think the experiment itself has a definitive scientific value? If so, what is it?

Zimbardo: It depends what you mean by scientific value.

Any reasonable science person: So, no.

OK, I'm done.
Read 8 tweets

Related threads

Profile picture
Humanitarian Wars for democracy and freedom are false and lying - 9

#Syria #WarCrimes #FakeNews #lies #terrorism
1.
 What was the UN created for?
What was the United Nations charter created for?
What were human rights associations created for?
What was the International Criminal Court created for?

Enough of double standars and hypocrisy. Enough is enough.
2.
 The United States, in order to be able to carry out its wars with the slogan of freedom and democracy, has continually blatantly lied, over many years, to the permanent representatives of other United Nations countries.
Read 194 tweets

Trending hashtags

#Khmeimim #Life #Israel #FreeSarahAndSean #immigrantwomen #Iraq #letter #Palestine #AlQaeda #professors #SaudArabia #Jamraya #Syrian #Cockroach #HAPPY #voicesIWS #SDC #Turkey #Ankara #Iran #SelfDevelopment #Latakia #HTS #Denmark #US

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member and get exclusive features!

Premium member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year)

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!