Funny thing is this. If someone actually bothered to critically read my work and point to the flaws - there are flaws in all works of history by the very nature of the discipline - I could respect it. None have yet had the minerals 2 but want to bang about academic credibility.
There are errors/blindspots and out of date info in books written by some of the greatest historians ever, so clearly there must be some in mine. People are too lazy to find them but wana chat to man. OK
Here I am having a chat about Shakespeare with some of the leading scholars in the world (people who do indeed know way more than I here) as you can see I made a total fool of myself cos I'm just pretending to have done the reading. LOL
Nope I am not being humble, why should I? I'm a rapper first. Rappers boast about cars and chains and how bad they are and how much gyal they woked. O boast about how many books I've read. Safe
Despite the fact that in real life I've had knife and gun pulled on me, had real life problems with man that actually kill, my actual friends and cousins did everything on road yours have. But I prefer to boast about reading. Safe
In other news. Hope you are all having a nice day and you know that twitter is not real life?
Gonna have to delete this app for a few weeks again and only pop in on laptop intermittently cos deadlines are looming again. But first imma talk a bit more shit while I wait for my plantain to boil. Safe
