Here's a checklist worth considering before deciding to invite an extremist onto a platform for a 1-on-1 interview or a "debate":
1. Does doing so risk giving the extremist a significant platform from which he/she can grow/reinforce his/her audience?
3. Would a traditional investigative piece with full context be a better way to cover/expose the extremist?
4. Would the extremist be able to exploit a combative/aggressive interview for his/her own purposes?
6. Is there a chance the interview is being sought more because of the notoriety/"get" value of the extremist
7. Is there a substantial likelihood that no noteworthy revelations will come from the interview?
8. Could the entity considering the interview lose credibility by going through with the interview?
One-on-one public interviews are not the most effective, accurate or meaningful
#newyorker #davidremnick #newyorkerfestival