The double standard on Nazi and Muslim anti-Semitic violence.
frontpagemag.com/fpm/271788/if-…
In 1999, Buford O. Furrow, a white supremacist, opened fire at a Jewish Community Center in the Los Angeles area.
While Furrow was carrying out his attack, President Bill Clinton was in the White House.
“A bias-motivated attempt to firebomb a synagogue?” the New York Times wondered. “Or a misguided message critical of Israeli policies against Palestinians?”
"I want these Jews to get out,” Haq could be heard shouting on the phone.
That same year, another major anti-Semitic terror plot was broken up by the FBI. But this time the perpetrators were Muslims and the media coverage couldn’t have been more different.
That’s quite a description of a man who had bragged, “With no hesitation, I will kill 10 Jews”
All this happened under Obama. Miller had expressed a certain implausible liking for Obama. Like Miller, Obama also had an affinity for Farrakhan, having posed with him, and for Iranian leaders.
It’s the media which has repeatedly expressed sympathy for synagogue terrorists.
And the media has two things in common with the Squirrel Hill synagogue shooter.
.@TheAtlantic decided to publish an execrable blood libel by @FranklinFoer which called for "shunning Trump’s Jewish enablers. Their money should be refused, their presence in synagogues not welcome."
That isn’t opposing anti-Semitism. It’s engaging in it.
The same journalists/activists lecturing on Trump’s complicity in the massacre were outraged when he cut funding to the Palestinian Authority terrorists who are being paid to murder Jews
They used axes, knives and a gun to murder four Rabbis, three of them Americans. Photos showed a floor covered in blood and torn prayer books.
President Trump has called for ruthless action against the Muslim and Neo-Nazi murderers of Jews. If the media wants to sincerely oppose anti-Semitism, it could take a lesson from him