David Cavender QC is cross-examining for the PO. I will call him QC for the purposes and Naushad is going to be NA.
#postofficetrial
NA Such a traumatic event sticks in the mind
QC what, the signing of contracts?
#postofficetrial
NA was a salesperson before becoming an SPMR selling therapeutic medicines to GPs
#postofficetrial
NA broadly agrees
QC now looking at his cv - taking him through his “excellent organisation and planning skills”
and “intelligent analytical outlook”
NA explaining why he used those terms
NA explaining what he did - how he entered data into the system
#postofficetrial
NA no not really - i just had to input the figures
QC in your interview with PO you said you had to check and change figures and make sure they tallied up
NA says no that’s wrong
#postofficetrial
NA yes I wanted to make a more stable life for myself, I had small children a mortgage to pay and there were a lot of redundancies in the pharmaceutical sector at the time
QC so you weren’t commercially naive?
#postofficetrial
QC you were an experience businessperson
NA I was a sales person - I’d never owned a business before.
We move on to contract discussions with NA's predecessor.
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
NA "When you have a problem there is no support. The helpline is useless.”
#postofficetrial
NA to tell you the truth I was really happy with getting the job so I just signed everything and sent it off the same day.
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
QC starts on whether he discussed the SPMR contract with his predecessor.
NA says no. if he had maybe it would have raised red flags
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
NA apologises and says he understands.
#postofficetrial
On his first letter from the PO, the QC says did you read this?
NA says just the first paragraph
QC you remember 11 years ago reading just the first par?
#postofficetrial
NA prevaricates and says its the way the letter is being presented on screen which is confusing
QC [incredulity] is that your answer?
#postofficetrial
[as I said - getting lively]
#postofficetrial
NA now familiarising himself with them on screen.
#postofficetrial
QC do you therefore accept that you received certain sections of the SPMR contract?
NA agrees
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
NA notes this only contains a summary of the contract and notes it also says, alongside the terms, it “cannot be relied upon for any purpose”
NA says when you read that…
QC moves swiftly on
#postofficetrial
NA says franchise was the word I heard
QC nowhere in any of the documents does it says franchise
NA okay - agent is fine too. I knew I wasn’t going to be an employee.
#postofficetrial
NA fulsomely agrees but notes when he took on the branch he was reliant on them as they were experienced and he wasn’t. he had to trust them.
#postofficetrial
NA agrees
QC and that you could not hide what you were doing from them
NA are you accusing me of hiding their money
QC we’ll come to that
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
QC interrupts him asking if he could just answer the question he is putting to him - “we don’t need a soliloquy every time I put something to you.”
#postofficetrial
NA agreeing he understood the broad ares of his responsibilities - staff, PO cash and stock,
QC homes in on branch accounts
#postofficetrial
NA do you remember being told by PO employee Elaine Ridge your responsibility wrt losses and that you had to make them good immediately.
#postofficetrial
NA calls it a checklist. he pushed back on a couple of things - says ER never gave him examples of the scale of losses he might have to pay back
#postofficetrial
NA says definitely not
Judge asks if he was told about immediate termination
NA says definitely not - it would have raised a red flag and he would have gone away to take advice
#postofficetrial
NA definitely not - goes into long speech about it - said he would have remembered it and if she did he would definitely have done it.
#postofficetrial
QC why are you so good at remembering this detail?
NA I would remember something like this! If someone…
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
NA goes on about wanting to be there to help staff with sales and motivate them
QC but you didn’t need to be there did you?
NA why wouldn’t I be?
#postofficetrial
NA there was something about 18 hours a week, I think I said in my business plan 14 hours a week so it never came up
#postofficetrial
NA can I finish my answer cos I keep getting cut off
QC can you look at the document
QC asks a question. NA starts to answer and the gets diverted onto scratchcards.
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
NA insists the figure of 18 hours a week exists somewhere
QC says it doesn’t
NA so I don’t have to be there at all?
#postofficetrial
NA that doesn’t make sense… who would be the SPMR?
QC you would.
NA… sorry that doesn’t register with me.
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
NA isn’t suspicious, he just doesn’t seem to see why the conversation is structured in the way it is. Or doesn’t care how it is structured. He is being very respectful, though.
Judge intervenes to take him to a doc...
#postofficetrial
QC asks if it is accurate
NA wants to draw his attention to something else in the document
QC says can you look at what I want you to look at
NA digs in and lists what he wants to list
#postofficetrial
He says he understands ER’s note to be an agreement that NA would work 18 hours a week. Is that a misunderstanding?
QC says it is.
#postofficetrial
Judge puts him in his place “Mr Abdulla. Just sit there quietly for a bit.”
and continues exploring the “factual point that is being put about the interview… what was put to NA about the hours”
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
NA i was using it in the sense of working together to make money
[presume to clarify he didn’t think the legal status of the PO/SPMR relationship was a partnership]
#postofficetrial
NA no I wasn’t you’re putting words where they shouldn’t be. I am not an IT expert.
#postofficetrial
NA “I can answer it!”
Judge “All three of you just stop a minute.”
Judge overrules JFSA QCs objection and allows PO QC to ask the question
#postofficetrial
NA I was just painting a picture
Judge - I know that, but Mr Cavender is going to put some specific points to you.
#postofficetrial
NA denies he should have responsibility for training on Horizon.
QC it should just be limited to products, is that what you’re saying?
#postofficetrial
QC not in the section here
NA but it does at the top here - the whole section is about products.
QC my lord, would this be a good time for a short break?
Judge I think that is a very good idea.
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
QC says he does not accept that for one moment.
#postofficetrial
QC you could have done - you could have said “look I’ve got this contract…”
NA I told you I didn’t have the contract
QC if you didn’t have it you would have asked about it
#postofficetrial
QC is this in your witness statement?
NA no it’s only just something I mention now
#postofficetrial
NA it was only something I mentioned in person on the day.
There is clearly a huge amount riding on whether or not SPMRs had a copy of their contracts. The PO QC is spending cumulative…
#postofficetrial
This would presumably be a lot easier if the Post Office could produce signed copies of those contracts as evidence.
#postofficetrial
NA “it was so rushed we didn’t have time to ask about signing things” and that’s when I asked about the contract?
QC so you were so rushed you couldn’t read your contracts but you still have time to ask questions?
#postofficetrial
NA It was very busy I just mentioned it in passing
QC Mr Abdulla I put it to you that you’re making this up as you go along.
NA No!
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
NA I can only remember Christine Adams.
QC read your witness statement
QC you say Ms Stevens attended
NA Christine Adams changed her name to Stevens or the other way around
QC that’s not true
#postofficetrial
There is a lot of activity on the PO lawyers benches talking to the PO observers.
#postofficetrial
NA depends on the contract
QC asks him about his contract
NA [sotto voce] Oh my god…
[pause] my Lord, do I need to answer that again?
Judge: not if it’s the same
#postofficetrial
NA it is
Judge okay
QC asking again about the docs he signed on transfer day
NA insisting he didn’t read them properly because things were so busy…
#postofficetrial
NA sorry what is the point of this conversation
The QC has made his point. We move on….
#postofficetrial
NA expected it to be good
QC and that you would expect training on its use
NA yes
QC and a reasonable helpline to assist you with any problems going forwards
NA not just a helpline - many other avenues of support
#postofficetrial
QC you query a range of transaction corrections (TC’s) and banking cheques - say Horizon is at fault
QC first of all - and PO don’t accept any of what you say in your WS...
NA you either accept it straight away or you settle it centrally and then you have to accept it later.
QC that’s not right.
#postofficetrial
NA I didn’t have that I had a laminated sheet
QC pauses
JFSA QC stands up to note his concern about this line of questioning and says in the PO’s defence it expressly accepts there is no way within Horizon…
#postofficetrial
NA says he hasn’t seen this before. Judge asks him to read it.
#postofficetrial
NA You either accept it or accept it centrally
QC and then dispute it which allows you to rollover
NA No
#postofficetrial
NA explains the two buttons on H which allow to settle to cash or settle centrally
QC says you can still dispute it though, and by disputing it you can rollover
#postofficetrial
QC I suggest you’re wrong
NA I suggest I’m right.
QC moves on
NA takes him back to explain the process again to the judge
#postofficetrial
QC but you are not under pressure to accept it. you can settle centrally, put it into dispute and you can carry on trading…
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
QC says he can tell who was using the branch terminals
NA asks how would he know if someone had accepted a TC if it came up on their screen and they pressed it there and then.
NA This whole process is fundamentally flawed. He starts explaining the process, at length. I’ll copy it in from his WS
apparently lost cheques. Throughout my appointment Post Office held me responsible
for any cheques which apparently went missing on the way from the branch to the...
then the fault was with me, and I had to pay in this amount. It is clear from the list of
transaction corrections that this happened on many occasions and for cheques for...
hundreds and thousands of pounds. Post Office didn’t carry out any investigation, it
just sent me a copy of the record of cheques I had sent out, and a photo copy of the
cheques the bank said it had received. I could not...
cheques had in fact been sent, and Post Office always accepted the bank’s position
where there was disagreement about this.
#postofficetrial
#postofficetrial
NA explains that the docket has the total but not the sums of individual cheques.
#postofficetrial
QC you thought this was a joke
NA it is a figure of speech
#postofficetrial
NA yes
QC well what did you think of the £5K shortfall (£4398)
NA explains he had a 5 counter PO, they had between £100K and £150K in the safe at any given time.
#postofficetrial
NA is asking questions about this
#postofficetrial
postofficetrial.com/2018/11/day-4-…