So for anyone who is interested in the facts, and not the rants here's a thread:
Look at any of @veritasium's other videos. For example his most popular video that looks at the Magnus Effect. You'll see citations.
It's an important unspoken statement he makes about who (& why) he thinks is worthy of mentioning.
Actually to call some of these instances a "meta issue" is just bizarre.
Krämer & Winter(2008): doi.org/10.1027/1864-1…
Rosenberg & Egbert (2011): doi.org/10.1111/j.1083…
Jackson & Lillker (2011): doi.org/10.1080/135723… [UK MPs on social media]
Hogan (2010): doi.org/10.1177/027046…
There's even a book on it by Cunningham (2013) called 'Social Networking and Impression Management'.
Davenport et al, (2014): doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.…
Andreassen et al, (2017): doi.org/10.1016/j.addb…
Bergman et al, (2011): doi.org/10.1016/j.paid…
Buffardi & Campbell, (2008): doi.org/10.1177/014616…
Siiback (2009): cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4…
Henderson & Bowley (2010) is just one example of a paper he could have chosen to cite -doi.org/10.1108/136325…