, 18 tweets, 12 min read Read on Twitter
The last days, a fascinating discussion has been happening on #econtwitter & #epitwitter abt #causalinference, pot outcomes, & dir acyclical graphs.

Since #AcademicTwitter is great for open discourse, & bad at keeping all in 1 place, I thought I provide this public good..

1/19
1st off, no idea where it all began; so this isn't chronological as much as topical.

From an econ perspective, a good start to get acquainted w/ the idea behind DAGs may be @yudapearl's #BookofWhy or this book amzn.to/2WuWf7d.

(Disclaimer: Haven't read them yet.)

2/19
Also, see this earlier paper for a more technical intro: bit.ly/2uwoRBa

As a 1st approximation, I found @PHuenermund's and @juli_schuess's slides helpful; to be found here: bit.ly/2uxW3Ze & here: bit.ly/2uwnGBK.

3/19
In my mind, what ppl like @yudapearl, @eliasbareinboim, & @PHuenermund argue is w/ DAGs you:

1st, use formal language of graphs to articulate knowledge abt causal relationships.

2nd, you evaluate the identifiability of the outcome w/ all hands on deck re: assumptions.

4/19
There are 2 confounding/selection biases that come up time & again as examples for how DAGs can be helpful:

Collider bias & M-bias.

5/19
1) Collider bias

A → B ← C

Let A be sb's looks & C be their talent. If either can bring you to Hollywood (B = job), among the stars, they may be neg correlated but could be independent in the pop!

If B is a collider, A & C are uncond indep, but become dep cond on B.

6/19
What @causalinf noted: is core of @conjugateprior @jonmummolo, et al's critique of Fryer (2018) on racial bias in police arrests.

@cdsamii notes, Heckman's selection problem is just cond on a collider's descendant: bit.ly/2Ue7tzB (p.19).

7/19
2) M-bias

As best as I understand, bias introduced by conditioning on a pre-treatment covariate in the presence of a particular M-structure: between a treatment, an outcome, two latent factors, & the covariate as "collider".

(Pic, HT @EpiEllie)

8/19
This is sth @EpiEllie pointed out as being one of the main selling points for DAGs to econs; see here: (also, great examples from epidemiology and sociology!)

(Helpful explainer of R package ggdag to play around w/ DAGs: cran.r-project.org/web/packages/g….)

9/19
Both types of biases are not entirely new to econs but have arguably been neglected (e.g., treated as "bad controls" in Mostly Harmless Metrics, mostlyharmlesseconometrics.com/2009/05/commen…).

This allusion by @autoregress to Frisch-Waugh is a helpful econ example: .

10/19
What everyone agrees on:

i) DAGs help clarify biases in an intuitive way!

ii) DAGs are helpful in teaching causality w/out the need of abstract math.

ii) DAGs can be helpful in checking the assumption of a model that has been built prior by use of contextual knowledge.

11/19
What's contested:

i) DAGs are useful, & that would be enough for paper to be seen as novel. But to make it part & parcel of syllabus is quite another thing. So, what are ways in which great econ papers are flawed that DAGs help resolve? (Along the lines of @Jabaluck)

12/19
ii) Relatedly, econs seem to use @yudapearl's backdoor criterion extensively. What is a concrete example of the frontdoor criterion put to good use in econ? (Point made by @MartinRavallion , here: )

13/19
iii) I think @Jabaluck's main critique is one of sequence: Fair if, 1st, we come up w/ "ready-made" DAGs (IV, RDD, Diff-in-diff, etc.) based on contextual knowledge & then use DAG to check assumptions. This adds to what micro econs do today. But don't turn it around!

14/19
iv) Complexity is an issue. When @eliasbareinboim contends that DAGs are helpful w/ "toy examples" of 4 vars but indispensable w/ a "100-var instance", @Jabaluck retorts that this is not a level of complexity that is useful for causal research ().

16/19
@causalinf had some helpful summaries, here: & here: .

@cdsamii had a fascinating application of the collider problem to FEs in panel data, here:

17/19
V much hope this is a fair representation of everyone's views.

Happy to stand corrected if not.

18/19
Bottomline:

1. I'll read much more on this

2. #AcademicTwitter is the best Twitter

3. I'm massively indebted to all the ppl linked above for their input

4. I now follow a couple ppl on #epitwitter

5. There's a thing called tough love and econs are really good at it..

/FIN
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to Julius Rüschenpöhler
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!