,
7 tweets,
3 min read
Read on Twitter
1/ Currency users are constrained by the money in their bank accounts. Currency issuers are constrained by their domestic supply of real resources*.
Issuers also set the BOUNDARIES of constraints for its users. If they want their citizens to be constrained more, they spend less.
Issuers also set the BOUNDARIES of constraints for its users. If they want their citizens to be constrained more, they spend less.
2/
(*raw materials, labor, technology, and time)
The more citizens are constrained, the more they are dependent on the whims and BEGRUDGING GENEROSITY of the privileged few – those who happen to be sitting on an (effectively) infinite stockpile of money.
(*raw materials, labor, technology, and time)
The more citizens are constrained, the more they are dependent on the whims and BEGRUDGING GENEROSITY of the privileged few – those who happen to be sitting on an (effectively) infinite stockpile of money.
3/ When a currency issuer spends less, it is their way of stepping aside to allow the wealthy few to *become* the government for those severely limited by money. A desperation that THEY CAUSED, by withholding their ABUNDANCE of resources from the people.
4/ It is exactly those privileged few who legally bribe our government officials to do it. They change the laws to make the less and less moral, more and more legal. They can’t profit (or control!) if the government provides us these things!
5/ The problem is not “government”! The problem are those who have *hijacked* our government and have shut us out of it completely.
6/6 Screaming “FREE MARKET IS BETTER THAN GOVERNMENT!!” is political and moral cover for immorally extracting wealth from suffering. Those leading this effort actively sabotage our government behind the scenes in hopes of making their conclusion come true.
@threadreaderapp unroll
