Thread by @emrazz

You are reviewing architectural proposals to rebuild Notre Dame.

Factors to consider:
- adherence to aesthetic standards
- engineering integrity
- budget
- timing for completion
- managing the public's expectations
- historical efficacy of the firm

Let's think this through.

Architect one proposes a breathtaking and awe inspiring ground up rebuild. Stated concerns are addressed, but with vague explanation. Some engineering elements seem problematic, but you are assured they'll find a way, despite no prior examples or undersigned engineer.

Budget estimates are provided, but materials cost far exceeds your available resources. Timing for completion is astoundingly fast. This architect, known for creativity and artful design but low ground-up delivery, is typically engaged for successful finishes and modifications.

Architect two proposes an aesthetically pleasing but less exciting rehab of the existing structure, which is a church, not a theme park, afterall. Stated concerns are addressed but need to be completed in phases in order to ensure integrity of engineering via accepted methods.

Budget estimates and materials cost breakdown are in line with your expectations. Some phases may be extended to accommodate resources but key reconstruction is possible to meet public expectations. This Architect has completed several successful rehab projects of this nature.

Who chooses architect one?
Someone who wants to wow the public, look great in the short term, and make their exit when the project isnt completed or doesnt resolve stated concerns

Who chooses architect two?
You, if you're reasonable. Elizabeth Warren will begin work immediately