,
3 tweets,
1 min read
Read on Twitter
I'm sure there are legitimate criticisms of how AOC has comported herself in Congress, but the amount of anonymous backbiting in this article is a joke. It's pure gossip, with no legitimate basis for the journalist granting such comprehensive anonymity. BS vanityfair.com/news/2019/06/a…
Anonymity obviously has a role, if the person would incur genuine risk or some other serious repercussion by attaching their name. But when anonymity is granted simply so cowards can traffic in gossip, there's no legitimate basis
I've been critical of AOC in certain respects because she's an elected official with significant power and that comes with the territory. But it's important to point out when she's subjected to unfair criticism, and offer praise when she does things that are laudable, such as: 
