drive.google.com/file/d/1M3Y6vj…
Judge: "No."
1/
Judge: "No. Because timing is an issue. Timing is an issue, and we've lost a week at this point. And this
isn't anything against anybody on this call. I've been told different things, and it's becoming increasingly frustrating."
2/
3/
4/
note and then overlooked it. I don't think there is currently a need to litigate the motion for preliminary injunction because there is at least one, if not more, injunction in place. So I do agree with that."
5/5
"Hulettt (attorney for plaintiff): "The President's tweet has some of the same effects that the addition of the question would in the first place and some of the same effects on the 18-month battle that was just waged over the citizenship question."
6/6
Judge: "So I guess the reason I wanted to have this call. . this morning I saw a tweet that got my attention. I don't know how many federal judges have Twitter accounts, but I happen to be one of them"
7/
8/
9/
10/
11/
12/
13/
14/
provision of that order that makes clear that the defendants will not communicate to the public anything to the contrary suggesting that the 2020 census is inquiring about citizenship status."
15/
16/
in an order they agree to. But let's assume for the sake of argument that they're not. "
17/
18/
19/
20/20