,
5 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
@asymmetricinfo @lieronet Correct. I don't care about any of the programmatic elements among the Dems right now and hope most of them fail on enactment. My one, single-minded goal is ending what I see as an existential threat to the country in Trump's presidency. /1
@asymmetricinfo @lieronet I think the Republicans have to pay the price for mutating into nothing more than a vehicle for a caudillo, so I'm arguing for depriving the GOP of votes at every level of government as a means of making them change. If I could pick and choose members, I would, but I can't. /2
@asymmetricinfo @lieronet There are good GOP house members I would save. But when you make enough exceptions, you wake up and find out that you made enough exceptions to let McCarthy become speaker and Nunes to stay chair of HPSCI. So, until this is over, no exceptions, imo. /3
@asymmetricinfo @lieronet But Dems who think this means I want President Harris to avenge 40 years of conservative policies by EO are crazy. I do not have to love the Dem nominee to make a coalition. As I said to @TheRickWilson -"Never Trump conservative" has *three* words in it. /4
@asymmetricinfo @lieronet @TheRickWilson I'm just willing to accept the policy damage of a President Harris or a President Warren if it means ending the national nightmare of a President Trump. Dems seem unable to grasp this, unfortunately. /5x
