If you’ve been reading my series on the origins of Spygate, then you’re familiar with the name Duane “Dewey” Clarridge.
In the 1970’s and 80’s, Clarridge was the CIA’s version of Peter Strzok. He was everywhere. He was somehow a key player in every major CIA operation, or so it seemed.
Long retired from the Agency, he played a small part in the 2016 presidential election as an advisor to Ben Carson.
In April 2016, Clarridge passed away. Prior to his death, he gave a final interview to Newsweek.
In the interview, he hinted that the October Surprise was real.
newsweek.com/duane-dewey-cl…
In November, Iranian students stormed the American embassy in Tehran, taking 52 Americans hostages.
As the 1980 presidential election drew nearer, the hostage crisis was becoming a serious political problem for the Carter administration.
As it turns out, the hostages were not released in October or November.
They were released on January 20, 1981...just after Ronald Reagan was sworn in as the nation’s 40th president.
Needless to say, there has been much speculation over the years about the reasons the hostages were released on that particular date.
According to Clarridge, the plot was revealed in George Cave’s book, October 1980. While the book was a work of fiction, Clarridge claimed, "What George tells you is the real story.”
"The whole novel is really true."
Some background on Cave: He attended Princeton University, where he was a Middle Eastern studies major. Prior to attending the university, he served a stint in the army. During that time, he went to language school and became fluent in Farsi.
His knowledge of Farsi made him an attractive recruit for the CIA.
Not only was it the language of Iran, Farsi was also the official language of Afghanistan in the 1950’s.
Cave became “our man in the Middle East” during his career in career in the CIA, serving in Iran, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia.
In his book, Cave makes the case that the October Surprise conspiracy was mainly due to the efforts of a character named Qays Tutunchi.
The character is clearly based on the Iranian exile Manucher Ghorbanifar.
In my previous thread, I discussed his as a major player -- an operator -- in the Iran-Contra affair.
(Case was also involved in Iran-Contra. He was brought in to translate as trust in Ghorbanifar diminished over time).
He was an international dealer in drugs and arms. He possessed only one moral virtue -- a desire to uphold his end of a deal.
Ghorbanifar (I will use his name rather than the character’s name from here on out) was a former asset of the SAVAK, the much-hated Iranian secret police closely tied to the CIA and Mossad.
latimes.com/archives/la-xp…
His closeness with the Israelis partly explains his future involvement in the Iran-Contra affair.
In 1979, Ghorbanifar was contacted by an influential member of the Republican party to discuss the hostage situation.
The character is named Fred Walters in the novel.
I have debated who the character corresponds to in real life. Bill Casey, Reagan’s campaign manager and the future CIA director, is named in the book, so it’s not him.
No doubt Cave was hesitant to use the name of this person because he is still alive and the character is the main connection between the GOP and the Iranians.
Plus, the character enjoys the company of an escort provided by Ghorbanifar. 🤫
While the clandestine meetings between Walter and the Iranians are going on, the British Home Office is trying to determine what Ghorbanifar is up to
The strength of the novel is the insight it provides into the mundane details of spycraft. There’s not a lot of 007 action. Instead, the characters eat...a lot.
It becomes a joke after a while, I assume the author was in on the joke.
A CIA officer in the book observes that the biggest challenge facing the Agency is the VCR (it’s 1980, don’t forget). Clarridge makes the same observation in his autobiography. An effective CIA agent can’t stay at home and watch movies.
He must mingle.
CIA operational work is mainly recruiting potential assets.
There a lot of good tidbits like this scattered throughout the book.
In the end, Cave doesn’t suggest there was a quid pro quo agreement between the GOP and the Iranian government to delay the release of the hostages until after the election.
He makes the case that the Republicans simply had better intel than the Carter administration.
Now, this is hardly a surprising conclusion coming from Cave, who, like many career CIA officers, was unhappy with the reforms of the Carter era.
Cave doesn’t mention Bush often, but I assume Papa Bush was involved.
Donald Gregg, on whom the Fred Walter character is partially based, was Bush’s national security advisor for 7 years in the 1980’s.
With superior connections and intel, the GOP was aware that the Iranians were in no rush to release the hostages.
The Carter administration, on the other hand
🔹 failed to appreciate the patience of the Iranians
🔹failed to identify who Iranian power players were
🔹finally, failed to appreciate the animosity of Ayatollah Khomeini felt toward President Carter.
Khomeini never forgot a speech Carter gave in Iran, effusively praising the Shah.
No doubt the novel’s greatest revelation is that Ghorbanifar, unbeknownst to the other players, both American and Iranian, arranged for escorts to place large bets all over Europe that Reagan would win the US election.
Even though he had inside information that there would be no October Surprise, it was still quite a gamble on Ghorbanifar’s part.
He hit the jackpot.
His good fortune didn’t end there -- in 1980 the Iran-Iraq war broke out.
It was a very good time to be an Iranian arms merchant.
Addendum: In 1992, the House of Representative assembled a task force to look into various October Surprise theories.
The final report concluded there was no evidence that anyone associated with the Reagan campaign attempted to intercede with the Iranians to delay the release of the hostages