,
4 tweets,
3 min read
Read on Twitter
The study conducted for @TheJusticeDept did not conclude this to be accurate, at all.
"We cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation's recent drop in gun violence," the DOJ-funded study explicity stated in 2004.
Want more? Okay...
"We cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation's recent drop in gun violence," the DOJ-funded study explicity stated in 2004.
Want more? Okay...
@TheJusticeDept Follow along Lolita Express-rider, @BillClinton...
"There is no compelling evidence that it saved lives."
Duke University public policy experts Philip Cook and Kristin Goss for their book, "The Gun Debate: What Everyone Needs to Know"
Want more?
"There is no compelling evidence that it saved lives."
Duke University public policy experts Philip Cook and Kristin Goss for their book, "The Gun Debate: What Everyone Needs to Know"
Want more?
@TheJusticeDept @BillClinton The claim the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban decreased total gun murders by 6.7%, is also bogus. It was rejected by researchers when @SenFeinstein first drummed up that lie.
The decline had nothing to do with the ban, rather a combination of other factors found in the mirror.
The decline had nothing to do with the ban, rather a combination of other factors found in the mirror.
@TheJusticeDept @BillClinton @SenFeinstein Put bluntly, @TheJusticeDept-funded study concluded the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban pissed on the Second Amendment for no damn reason.
"Should it be renewed, the ban's effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement."
"Should it be renewed, the ban's effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement."
