,
4 tweets,
4 min read
Read on Twitter
Here's to @realDonaldTrump watching the bestseller lists more closely next week than he did this week, as next week Proof of Conspiracy is eligible and this week Pirro didn't hit number one.
@RealDonaldTrump and @senatemajldr should heed @Scaramucci and read Proof of Conspiracy.
@RealDonaldTrump and @senatemajldr should heed @Scaramucci and read Proof of Conspiracy.
@realDonaldTrump @senatemajldr @Scaramucci (UPDATE) I thought Pirro/Trump were referring to the NYT bestseller list, but they meant the Washington Post list (which I'd never heard of; it has DC-only and national iterations). Pirro is now implying that the NYT is not "honestly reporting" her book as #1 (as there it's #3).
@realDonaldTrump @senatemajldr @Scaramucci (UPDATE2) But hey, credit where credit is due: Pirro/Trump did indeed find a list that has Pirro at number one, and as Trump avoided saying which list it was—though he knew most would assume he meant NYT—he managed to tweet something technically accurate. Previous tweets deleted.
@realDonaldTrump @senatemajldr @Scaramucci (UPDATE3) Man, I really hope neither @realDonaldTrump nor @JudgeJeanine tweet at me to gloat about my... "error." 😉
