@errorsim, I'll tell you why I'm optimistic.
In her book, The Future is History, @mashagessen quotes scholar Bálint Magyar: “The conditions preceding the democratic big bang have a decisive role in the formation of the system.”
Russia had never known democracy. They went from a Czar to Bolshevism.
Disciplines like sociology were banned, so Russians didn’t have the tools to understand themselves or their society.
Source ⤵️
In 1991, the Party had a monopoly on power and resources: All industries were centralized and in the hands of the government.
Researchers thought that 10% was encouragingly high. 20% wanted to liquidate “rockers” (this meant “hippies”)
That was when the oligarchs (thieves) seized control of the nation’s industries.
Democracy never took hold.
Russians quickly lost faith in the new government. (Meet the new boss. Same as the old boss)
Putin whipped up the old hysteria over homosexuals . . .
Most Russians hungered for an authoritarian figure.
Similar stories can be told about Hungary and other countries giving in to authoritarianism.
There was no intellectual vacuum. The drafters of the Constitution were well-versed in the classics & philosophy, which they used for guidance.
The states already had working local governments. . .
Wealth and power were entirely in the hands of elite white men—but there were a lot of them and they were spread out.
There was a continent of land and resources (which belonged to someone else—another of the conditions of our Big Bang)
A kind of representative democracy thus took hold in the U.S.— a democracy in which a certain portion of the population (white men) enjoyed freedom & opportunity.
. . . but the institutions are holding out.
Courts are ruling against Trump
Career diplomats and career law enforcement are marching to Congress to testify against Trump
Democracy is winning.
Remember that one goal of active measures is to destroy people's confidence in democracy, because once people lose faith, democracy dies.
"It's all over! We're already an autocracy!"
"They'll win in 2020 by flipping millions of votes!"
"What about the judicial appointments!"
all you're doing is helping Putin and Trump, so stop.
Okay . . . I'll take one despair question.
I'll explain, but first, obvious fact: 6 years of a Democratic president making appointments will balance out Trump's appointments + McConnell's obstruction.
How far to the right?
In the 1960s judges were confirmed who openly supported racial segregation.
archive.boston.com/news/globe/obi…
In 1923, SCOTUS ruled minimum wage unconstitutional.
Right wing courts have almost always been a problem.
What we're facing is nothing new.
We should have a rule about despair mongering. . .
If enough people put in the work, democracy will survive.
See my list: terikanefield-blog.com/things-to-do/
They are energy-draining and demoralizing.
Besides, we tend to worry about the wrong things.
So let's deal with each crisis as it comes.