Question: Why would an investigation into Burisma hurt Biden? If everything was on the up-and-up, how could it damage Biden’s candidacy?
Same Q about Clinton’s emails. We’ve been told any attempt to find her destroyed emails (which were under a congressional subpoena) was...
Same Q about Clinton’s emails. We’ve been told any attempt to find her destroyed emails (which were under a congressional subpoena) was...
“election interference.” The takeaway is that the exposed info would’ve damaged—perhaps ended—either campaign.
Covering it up, refusing to investigate is the real election interference.
Covering it up, refusing to investigate is the real election interference.
Every witness has admitted Hunter Biden’s role was a conflict of interest. Kent testified he had previous concerns about it. John Kerry’s stepson ended his association with Rosemont Seneca after Biden and Archer took their gigs with Burisma.
Kent said Burisma is corrupt and...
Kent said Burisma is corrupt and...
would support a reopening of the probe into Burisma. Hunter Biden just stepped down in April after dad announced his candidacy. This isn’t old news.
And I’m not buying that Trump/Giuliani only wanted a “statement.” They still want the investigations—the aid has been released.
And I’m not buying that Trump/Giuliani only wanted a “statement.” They still want the investigations—the aid has been released.
This is the EXACT SAME PLAYBOOK they used with Clinton: Trump asked a foreign power to “interfere in our elections” when he joked about Russia finding her deleted emails. Jim Comey claimed he OPENED AN INVESTIGATION into George P because someone told him they had her emails...
And that—like Biden-Burisma—is the coverup. The crime wasn’t destroying evidence or mishandling classified material, no, it was Trump making a joke. The problem isn’t the VP’s son getting rich off a corrupt foreign company and dad calling off the dogs, no, it’s Trump’s phone call
Now we have it tass.com/world/1090971
