If a lawyer working to help clear their client of false charges hires a team of investigators to find exonerating evidence, would it be customary to divulge the results of those investigations to others?
If the investigation uncovered evidence of malfeasance by his client’s...
If the investigation uncovered evidence of malfeasance by his client’s...
“Friends and colleagues” would you expect the attorney to share those results with the very people implicated in the investigation?
So it is not unusual, and in fact would be tantamount to malpractice if the attorney did not advise his client of the evidence he uncovered?
So it is not unusual, and in fact would be tantamount to malpractice if the attorney did not advise his client of the evidence he uncovered?
In simple terms, if Giuliani had evidence of Ukrainian interference in the 2016 elections that implicated US government officials, it would not be unheard of to keep that information between himself & his client and recommend his client be wary of those claiming otherwise?
Is it possible that despite publicly available information to the contrary, Ukraine and certain US officials conspired against the Trump campaign in conjunction with the DNC, and the public was not aware of this evidence because it would only be made public in the event of trial?
@threadreaderapp unroll
