THREAD
1.
Dedicated to the following D who won in 2018!
@RepOHalleran @lucymcbath @RepUnderwood @RepCheri @RepFinkenauer @daveloebsack @RepCindyAxne @RepGolden @RepSlotkin @RepHaleyStevens @RepAngieCraig @collinpeterson @RepSusieLee @RepChrisPappas @CongressmanJVD @RepAndyKimNJ
1.
Dedicated to the following D who won in 2018!
@RepOHalleran @lucymcbath @RepUnderwood @RepCheri @RepFinkenauer @daveloebsack @RepCindyAxne @RepGolden @RepSlotkin @RepHaleyStevens @RepAngieCraig @collinpeterson @RepSusieLee @RepChrisPappas @CongressmanJVD @RepAndyKimNJ
2. D’s Cont.
@RepJoshG @RepSherrill @RepTorresSmall @RepMaxRose @RepSeanMaloney @repdelgado @RepBrindisi @RepKendraHorn @RepCartwright @RepConorLamb @JoeCunninghamSC @RepBenMcAdams @RepElaineLuria @RepSpanberger @RepRonKind
FACTS & WITNESS TESTIMONY ON THE BIGGEST VOTE YOU HAVE
@RepJoshG @RepSherrill @RepTorresSmall @RepMaxRose @RepSeanMaloney @repdelgado @RepBrindisi @RepKendraHorn @RepCartwright @RepConorLamb @JoeCunninghamSC @RepBenMcAdams @RepElaineLuria @RepSpanberger @RepRonKind
FACTS & WITNESS TESTIMONY ON THE BIGGEST VOTE YOU HAVE
3. In this exchange by @RepMikeTurner to Hill & Holmes, Turner suggests they would be “laughing stock of history”. I disagree, the laughing stock of history would be ANY Democrat who votes for this farce of an impeachment based on the facts!
4. Facts
1. This impeachment inquiry started based on @POTUS phone call. (Or so we were told)
2. Republicans have not been able to call witnesses
3. President and all of Americans do not know who the WB is. Normally in a court one can face their accusers!
1. This impeachment inquiry started based on @POTUS phone call. (Or so we were told)
2. Republicans have not been able to call witnesses
3. President and all of Americans do not know who the WB is. Normally in a court one can face their accusers!
5.
Transcript of the phone call.
Have you ever heard a Trump rally prior to @POTUS winning? He is 100% against corruption, America FIRST, against countries getting aide while 🇺🇸 gets nada.
Zelensky talks first about draining the swamp= corruption
whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
Transcript of the phone call.
Have you ever heard a Trump rally prior to @POTUS winning? He is 100% against corruption, America FIRST, against countries getting aide while 🇺🇸 gets nada.
Zelensky talks first about draining the swamp= corruption
whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
Drain the swamp, corruption, and other countries not stepping up to help the country. All brought up by Zelensky first. 
8. First to testify on 11/13
William Taylor & George Kent
1. Hearsay witnesses! Never heard the call!
Look at some of their testimony as well as who they are! ALL of this is important to know. YOU are voting to overturn 63 MILLION VOTES FOR @POTUS SO ALL OF THIS MATTERS!
William Taylor & George Kent
1. Hearsay witnesses! Never heard the call!
Look at some of their testimony as well as who they are! ALL of this is important to know. YOU are voting to overturn 63 MILLION VOTES FOR @POTUS SO ALL OF THIS MATTERS!
9. William Taylor in his own words!
What Taylor “thought” never happened.
What Taylor “thought” never happened.
11. Ambassador Taylor
*NOT on the July 25 call
*Has NOT spoken to @POTUS
* ONLY KNOWLEDGE OF THE SITUATION COMES FROM A @nytimes article!
dailywire.com/news/devin-nun…
*NOT on the July 25 call
*Has NOT spoken to @POTUS
* ONLY KNOWLEDGE OF THE SITUATION COMES FROM A @nytimes article!
dailywire.com/news/devin-nun…
16. George Kent
Next hearsay witness. Never on the call!
@RepStefanik does a wonderful job in her exchange with Kent. Listen to the dates. Watch more than once!
Next hearsay witness. Never on the call!
@RepStefanik does a wonderful job in her exchange with Kent. Listen to the dates. Watch more than once!
19. Ambassador Yovanovitch
Testimony 11-15
NOT on call
Fired Ambassador
Not a fact witness
Testimony 11-15
NOT on call
Fired Ambassador
Not a fact witness
23. Yovanovitch anti-Trump and showing her disdain for @POTUS at her job.
dailywire.com/news/calls-gro…
dailywire.com/news/calls-gro…
25.
No bribery
No quid pro quo
No talk of withholding aid
No bribery
No quid pro quo
No talk of withholding aid
26. Finally! A witness on the call.
Morrison testimony on 11-19
Morrison testimony on 11-19
27. Morrison talks about Vindman‘s character.
28. Testimony of Vindman
Date 11-19
Funny he recites an evaluation from Hill before she left. He does not answer the question. Date of evaluation is BEFORE THE PHONE CALL AND BEFORE HE LEAKS!
Date 11-19
Funny he recites an evaluation from Hill before she left. He does not answer the question. Date of evaluation is BEFORE THE PHONE CALL AND BEFORE HE LEAKS!
29. Vindman should have gone to his supervisor, Morrison, if he was upset about phone call. He never did.
He wore uniform to hearing as a show only.
He wore uniform to hearing as a show only.
30. Vindman is caught embellishing his resume and stating he was at a meeting he never was at.
31. Suddenly Vindman/Schiff who claim not to know who the whistleblower is are concerned about outing the whistleblower?!
32. Vindman is offered a job in Ukraine multiple times?!!
33. Vindman Cont.
Recap he does NOT go to his boss about the call.
Williams states call is “unusual” but reports it to no one!
Recap he does NOT go to his boss about the call.
Williams states call is “unusual” but reports it to no one!
34. Vindman testimony Cont.
Caught again!
Caught again!
35. Jennifer Williams
Testimony 11-19
Was on the call. Her opinion, the call was “unusual”. Yet, she did NOT report this “unusual” call to any of her supervisors. She put a hard copy in a book. It ended there. She didn’t discuss the call with anyone.
Testimony 11-19
Was on the call. Her opinion, the call was “unusual”. Yet, she did NOT report this “unusual” call to any of her supervisors. She put a hard copy in a book. It ended there. She didn’t discuss the call with anyone.
36. Ambassador Sondland
Testimony date 11-20
His testimony is about his “presumptions” although he was on the call.
@RepMikeTurner finally gets straight answers.
Testimony date 11-20
His testimony is about his “presumptions” although he was on the call.
@RepMikeTurner finally gets straight answers.
37. Ambassador Sondland
“No quid pro quo”
“No quid pro quo”
38. Sondland tells Schiff “no quid pro quo”
*correction to #36. Sondland was NOT on 7-25 call
*correction to #36. Sondland was NOT on 7-25 call
40. Adam Schiff, who all Democrats refused to censure, lies and you all follow his lead!
41. Testimony of Cooper & Hale
Neither on the call. All hearsay testimony on 11-20
Neither on the call. All hearsay testimony on 11-20
42. Fiona Hill testimony 11-21
Was NOT on phone call!
Connections to the Steele dossier.
Was NOT on phone call!
Connections to the Steele dossier.
43. Hill testimony and what happened in 2016 election.
46. Holmes testimony 11-21
NOT on the call. He heard Sondland on phone with POTUS. His testimony is literally playing the game telephone!
Sondland on his personal phone. Holmes claims although Sondland call not on speaker, he heard POTUS.
NOT on the call. He heard Sondland on phone with POTUS. His testimony is literally playing the game telephone!
Sondland on his personal phone. Holmes claims although Sondland call not on speaker, he heard POTUS.
47. Holmes Cont.
48. Personal favorite exchange with Holmes. Call is so alarming and he heard a call yet seems to not know some key details.
49. The Constitutional lawyers & @JoeCunninghamSC @RepCunningham
Rep Cunningham’s one of the targeted 31 Democrats. He’s also a “lawyer”! According to this latest article, instead of continuing to dodge the impeachment question, he should just come out & say he supports it.
Rep Cunningham’s one of the targeted 31 Democrats. He’s also a “lawyer”! According to this latest article, instead of continuing to dodge the impeachment question, he should just come out & say he supports it.
50. @JoeCunninghamSC @RepCunningham
Seriously? As a lawyer, have you researched these constitutional lawyers who witnessed NOTHING and only provided their BIASED PARTISAN OPINIONS?
live5news.com/2019/12/06/cun…
Seriously? As a lawyer, have you researched these constitutional lawyers who witnessed NOTHING and only provided their BIASED PARTISAN OPINIONS?
live5news.com/2019/12/06/cun…
51. Karlan
I’m sure being photographed with Holder and being recognized by Attorney Lynch she would not be partisan or biased in her opinions in any way, correct? @RepCunningham @JoeCunninghamSC
I’m sure being photographed with Holder and being recognized by Attorney Lynch she would not be partisan or biased in her opinions in any way, correct? @RepCunningham @JoeCunninghamSC
52. Although, here is a photo of you, @RepCunningham @JoeCunninghamSC with Holder. 🤔Wasn’t Holder held in contempt of Congress in 2012?
Pretty sneaky of ya, not to post this on your OWN social media. We know YOU have to keep that “moderate” image under wraps.
Pretty sneaky of ya, not to post this on your OWN social media. We know YOU have to keep that “moderate” image under wraps.
53. @JoeCunninghamSC @RepCunningham didn’t share the above photo bc he had to keep up his “moderate” facade. I mean when Holder says weeks before the election he wants to kick @POTUS supporters, sly Joe knew not to show his love fest photo with Holder.
54. Back to Karlan, who @RepCunningham @JoeCunninghamSC finds delivered “incredibly concerning” testimony.
Is her bias towards liberal candidates concerning? Is it concerning to you that she did not witness anything, & was brought in to testify bc of her extreme bias?
Is her bias towards liberal candidates concerning? Is it concerning to you that she did not witness anything, & was brought in to testify bc of her extreme bias?
55. @RepCunningham @JoeCunninghamSC do you think this woman who walks on the opposite side of the road from a Trump hotel may be PARTISAN OR BIASED IN HER OPINION TESTIMONY?
56. @JoeCunninghamSC @RepCunningham let’s look at your next credible lawyer. 🙄
Feldman
This man testified he was not for impeachment until the 7-2019 phone call. His own words prove otherwise.
Feldman
This man testified he was not for impeachment until the 7-2019 phone call. His own words prove otherwise.
61. @RepCunningham @JoeCunninghamSC
Here is Gerhardt with Obama.
Are you serious that you don’t think there was a hidden agenda in their non witness to a phone call, opinion testimony bc they hate @POTUS
nydailynews.com/opinion/michae…
Here is Gerhardt with Obama.
Are you serious that you don’t think there was a hidden agenda in their non witness to a phone call, opinion testimony bc they hate @POTUS
nydailynews.com/opinion/michae…
62. @JonathanTurley was unbiased, an admitted Democrat, and not a @POTUS supporter.
THE VILE TREATMENT FROM YOUR PARTY TOWARDS HIM @RepCunningham @JoeCunninghamSC IS DISGUSTING
THE VILE TREATMENT FROM YOUR PARTY TOWARDS HIM @RepCunningham @JoeCunninghamSC IS DISGUSTING
63. @RepCunningham @JoeCunninghamSC you think @POTUS abused his power?
The R’s in the LowCountry call you a Pelosi puppet, I disagree, you are a Schiff puppet! As a lawyer is obtaining phone records of reporters alarming to you?
The R’s in the LowCountry call you a Pelosi puppet, I disagree, you are a Schiff puppet! As a lawyer is obtaining phone records of reporters alarming to you?
64. @RepCunningham @JoeCunninghamSC
As a lawyer you should know that this is NOT okay! Does the @POTUS have attorney/ client privilege? You okay with your master @RepAdamSchiff getting @RudyGiuliani phone records too?
As a lawyer you should know that this is NOT okay! Does the @POTUS have attorney/ client privilege? You okay with your master @RepAdamSchiff getting @RudyGiuliani phone records too?
65. @RepCunningham @JoeCunninghamSC
Just come out & say you support impeachment. Your lying/ con act as a moderate is getting old!
You are heavily involved w/Indivisible (resist Trump group), let them meet w/ your COS privately in Feb, they have been resisting since 11-9-16!
Just come out & say you support impeachment. Your lying/ con act as a moderate is getting old!
You are heavily involved w/Indivisible (resist Trump group), let them meet w/ your COS privately in Feb, they have been resisting since 11-9-16!
66. @RepCunningham @JoeCunninghamSC Your D colleague @collinpeterson gave a VERY INSIGHTFUL QUOTE.
Joe, you have received $4,000 from your master @RepAdamSchiff what were you sent money for? Your whole hypocrisy is blowing up before your eyes! #1termJoe
mprnews.org/story/2019/11/…
Joe, you have received $4,000 from your master @RepAdamSchiff what were you sent money for? Your whole hypocrisy is blowing up before your eyes! #1termJoe
mprnews.org/story/2019/11/…
