However, why did Instagram win, over much better funded rivals Color and PicPlz ? A $100B story..
He started developing Instagram instead..
instagram.com/p/G/
If you are Kevin Systrom, what do you do ? Ignore, and keep building, of course. Two months later, Instagram launches.
techcrunch.com/2010/08/23/pic…
That's $425k for domain names only, compared to all of $500k raised by Instagram by that point.
Kevin had pivoted to what PicPlz was doing - a nuance which NY Times handled a little differently
"we couldn’t morally go with Instagram"
Ethics > $
bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/20/how…
techcrunch.com/2010/11/11/and…
blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital…
Instagram was driven by "elegant minimalism", focusing on speed, self-expression (via filters) and instant gratification while PicPlz had an awkward UX, which this user pointed out
quora.com/What-is-the-di…
If enough people used it at a location, it would be valuable - but what's the incentive for the first few ?
By Jan 2011, they had acknowledged user experience problems and had re-worked the app. One Quora user wrote - it was then as good as Instagram.
techcrunch.com/2011/01/13/pic…
It had the Hello Kitty effect.
web.archive.org/web/2012062221…
Screenshot from my own notes +
wired.com/2014/10/why-in…
They re-used Burbn code; 8 weeks dev time from start to finish => Instagram
techcrunch.com/2012/04/09/ins…
- Sept 2010: Private beta of 100 users
- October 6, 2010: 25,000 users
- November 2010: 1 million users
- 2012: 30 million users
- 2013: 200 million users
wired.com/2015/10/five-y…
Founders developed a very sharp + narrow focus, built a useful and beautiful product + leveraged Silicon Valley appropriately for news coverage.
Magic happened, they then focused on being able to scale and were able to take off exponentially
techcrunch.com/2010/09/20/ins…
Reading these essays inspired this thread:
paulgraham.com/fp.html
paulgraham.com/sun.html
Instagram was "not much new"
techcrunch.com/2012/04/09/ins…
cc @paulg you might like this thread