Thanks Michael. There was much more to say. I could not believe I watched two DOJ lawyers make arguments, some supportable others frivolous, but ALL intended solely to cover up presidential crimes, abuses and corruption. This is the antithesis of what DOJ should be arguing.
They argue that you can’t indict a sitting president (courtesy of a BS DOJ memo) because they say the sole Constitutional remedy to dislodge a criminal president is impeachment. Then they turn around and argue that Congress can’t have the testimony or documents necessary ...
to prove Trump committed impeachable offenses. The DOJ is making arguments that damage, not promote, the rule of law. They make arguments designed to assist the president in covering-up his crimes. They they make arguments directly against the intererests of the American people.
