"House Democrats' assertion that asking historical questions about the *last* election somehow equates to securing 'improper interference' in the *next* election is nonsensical"
"In a government of laws, asserting legal defenses cannot be treated as obstruction"
"It would permit Congress to threaten every President with impeachment merely for protecting the prerogatives of the Presidency"
might be interpreted, by the malignity of party, into a deliberate, wicked action,' and thus should
not provide the basis for impeachment."
ratifying convention that '[n]o man ever thought of impeaching a man for an opinion.'"
insufficient, the House has *never* impeached a President on charges that did not include a violation of established law."