McConnell speech totally contradicts itself. It first claims the House “declined to hear from witnesses.” House of course never “declined”—they didn’t want to get bogged down in long court fight.
Then McConnell says witnesses shouldn’t be called in Senate. His reason? Omg ...
Then McConnell says witnesses shouldn’t be called in Senate. His reason? Omg ...
He says that would lead to a lengthy court fight and generate destructive precedent. This is precisely what he said should have happened in the House! Makes zero sense.
And he’s wrong about that too. Chief Justice can rule on exec priv claims quickly. No ct fight. Unlike House
And he’s wrong about that too. Chief Justice can rule on exec priv claims quickly. No ct fight. Unlike House
McConnell argument thus boomerangs.
It demonstrates that he will do anything, and say anything, to try to prevent the American people from learning the truth.
It should be simple-If the President’s behavior was perfect&beautiful, why are they so afraid of documents+witnesses?
It demonstrates that he will do anything, and say anything, to try to prevent the American people from learning the truth.
It should be simple-If the President’s behavior was perfect&beautiful, why are they so afraid of documents+witnesses?
