@JoyJ69957841 @maidros78 @A1A2A3A4A786 @authorAneesh @Ram_Guha @sarkar_swati and all of these rants from you (many of which are of dubious foundations) still doesnt give any reason as to why Tipus jihadi actions against Hindus cannot be talked about. Can you answer the original question explaining what is wrong in the article detailing Tipus jihad?
@JoyJ69957841 @maidros78 @A1A2A3A4A786 @authorAneesh @Ram_Guha @sarkar_swati there are little to no discussions at all about early physically destructive iconoclasm in Buddhist strands, or the possibility of Buddhist structures having been put upon or taken over from pre-existing pre-Buddhist religions. How does that make Tipus jihad a lie?
@JoyJ69957841 @maidros78 @A1A2A3A4A786 @authorAneesh @Ram_Guha @sarkar_swati u can judge opIndia and blast them as to why they dont publish articles to ur liking: but it still doesnt make Tipus jihad on ground and records of his atrocities on Hindus - a lie.
