@mzjacobson Hi Mark, thanks for the reply. I acknowledged in the thread that 100% renewables is feasible. That was not the claim you made in your tweet.
@mzjacobson Your claim here that "no legitimate study finds nuclear, CCS lower cost" also must apply your personal opinion as to what constitutes "legitimacy." I hope you can admit it stands in contrast to peer review process and summary of IPCC Working Group 3 for example.
@mzjacobson I would be perfectly happy if jurisdictions end up building a 100% renewable energy systems. You/I may even prefer that option to all others. But 100% wind, water, solar is obviously not the ONLY way to decarbonize energy systems. The peer reviewed literature explores many others
