Thread by @BenjaminNorton

The official vote counts from the Massachusetts Democratic primary differed significantly from the exit poll

Sanders won in the exit poll and lost in the computer count

Discrepancies between Sanders and Biden totaled 8.2%— double the 4.0% margin of error tdmsresearch.com/2020/03/04/mas…

The computerized vote counts from the South Carolina Democratic primary also differed significantly from the exit poll, yet again greatly exceeding its margin of error

Biden’s vote count exhibited the largest increase (+8.3%) from his exit poll projection tdmsresearch.com/2020/03/02/sou…

The US remains one of the few major 'democracies' in the world that allow computerized vote counting—not observable by the public—to determine the results of elections

Most countries protect the integrity of their elections with publicly observable hand-counting of paper ballots

Noticing a pattern here: The New Hampshire Democratic primary computerized vote count results also greatly exceeded the exit poll margin of error

Buttigieg’s official unverified computer-generated vote totals represented a 12% increase from the exit poll tdmsresearch.com/2020/02/17/new…

Official, unverified computer vote results in the 2016 Democratic primary significantly exceeded the exit poll margin of error

States with a paper trail showed higher support for Sanders; states without a paper trail showed much higher support for Clinton
tdmsresearch.com/2016/06/20/45/

The US gov's own soft-power arm USAID, which meddles in elections across the globe, says in its election guide:
"A discrepancy between the aggregated choices reported by voters [exit polls] and the official results may suggest, but not prove, that results have been tampered with"